Notice: My personal stance on AI generated artwork. Retweet and share if you agree. Let us discuss, and not immediately scream bloody murder.

Now Viewing: News Article of Note
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.

Xiombarg - Group: Retired Staff - Total Posts: 12
user_avatar
News Article of Note
Posted on: 12/29/08 08:43PM

Something that might eventually effect this (and Many other) posting sites. This article popped up on Slashdot.org:
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28319199/
Have a peek, and Judge for Yourselves...

Be afraid. Be Very Afraid. . .



lhixl90 - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 267
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/29/08 09:05PM

Oh me god, dont tell me im gonna be put to remove all loli and toddlercon XD

Well, I dont like anything thats too extreme like toddlercon anyway.



lhixl90 - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 267
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/29/08 09:11PM




lhixl90 - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 267
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/29/08 10:19PM

source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon

On April 30, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the PROTECT Act of 2003 (also dubbed the Amber Alert Law) which again criminalizes all forms of pornography that shows people under the age of 18 regardless of production. The Act introduced 18 U.S.C. § 1466A "Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in ... sexual intercourse ... and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value" (the third test of the Miller Test obscenity determination).

In February 2007, Senator John McCain introduced S.519, which would add a mandatory 10-year prison sentence to anyone who uses the Internet to violate the PROTECT Act.



lozertuser - Group: The Fake Administrator - Total Posts: 2230
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/30/08 04:00AM

It has never been successfully tried in court. Usually it is someone with real CP that made them go to jail. We will find out what is going to happen when the book collector gets a verdict. Until then, I refuse to remove images.

Whorley also received digital photographs of actual children engaging in sexual conduct and sent and received e-mails graphically describing parents sexually molesting their children.



grgspunk - Group: Retired Staff - Total Posts: 34
user_avatar
Posted on: 01/04/09 01:05AM

^Actually, even if the verdict is supposedly guilty for the Iowan book collector case, his conviction will be based on whether the content he had was "obscene" (which had always been considered illegal), rather than "loli". The PROTECT Act had already been thrown out in that particular case: It won't really be considered a blanket ban on "loli" content, even if the guy gets a guilty verdict.

So either way, it's kinda pointless to worry about it: Start worrying when there's a case where there's no "obscenity" clause involved.



add_replyAdd Reply


1