Now Viewing: Subjective Tagging Discussion
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 08/24/12 08:24PM
Currently our tag policy says so as well.
Posted on: 08/24/12 08:44PM
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=wiki&s=view&id=29
Not here.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=wiki&s=view&id=199
But here. For tagging purposes I guess... but why is it this way? It doesn't make sense. With the size ladder it doesn't seem like it should matter. It isn't going to flood your searches with anything that bothers you unless you are really bad with tags... which would be us user's fault not the policies'.
Not here.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=wiki&s=view&id=199
But here. For tagging purposes I guess... but why is it this way? It doesn't make sense. With the size ladder it doesn't seem like it should matter. It isn't going to flood your searches with anything that bothers you unless you are really bad with tags... which would be us user's fault not the policies'.
Posted on: 08/24/12 08:55PM
A tag's own tag wiki should be the only source you use for information on its application, as when official changes are made to its meaning, pages which refer to the tag may not also be changed and may be out of date.
Anyway, it's possible that it may change in certain cases in the future.
Anyway, it's possible that it may change in certain cases in the future.
Posted on: 08/27/12 11:38PM
glasses_off
vs
no_glasses
Not a whole lot of difference. Wording makes the former sound appropriate for glasses being on screen but not worn. Not sure if it should still exist or not though. It felt weird using no_glasses and glasses in the same image, but it is already being done in the wiki example.
vs
no_glasses
Not a whole lot of difference. Wording makes the former sound appropriate for glasses being on screen but not worn. Not sure if it should still exist or not though. It felt weird using no_glasses and glasses in the same image, but it is already being done in the wiki example.
Response to Anti_Gendou glasses.
Posted on: 08/27/12 11:50PM
From the Danbooru wiki:
glasses_removed: "If the glasses are still present in the image but not worn, use glasses_removed instead." Glasses_off has been aliased to this tag.
Bespectacled: "When characters, who normally do not wear corrective eye-wear, wear corrective eye-wear. Sunglasses do not count and are tagged as separate."
no_glasses: "A character who usually wears glasses is not wearing them. If the glasses are still present in the image but not worn, use glasses_removed instead."
glasses_removed: "If the glasses are still present in the image but not worn, use glasses_removed instead." Glasses_off has been aliased to this tag.
Bespectacled: "When characters, who normally do not wear corrective eye-wear, wear corrective eye-wear. Sunglasses do not count and are tagged as separate."
no_glasses: "A character who usually wears glasses is not wearing them. If the glasses are still present in the image but not worn, use glasses_removed instead."
Posted on: 08/28/12 12:17AM
Do we have different definitions for gangbang and gangrape; as Danbooru only uses gangbang. If we do not have two distinct definitions, any objections of gangrape -> gangbang?
A lot of images have both tags on them as members are most likely using them to mean the same thing: gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;tags=gangrape+gangbang
Also, Danbooru has aliased foursome and fivesome into group_sex as per their definition, group_sex covers 4+ participants. Shall we keep foursome and fivesome, or mass edit into group_sex to match Danbooru?
EDIT:
Will edit glasses_off into glasses_removed.
A lot of images have both tags on them as members are most likely using them to mean the same thing: gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;tags=gangrape+gangbang
Also, Danbooru has aliased foursome and fivesome into group_sex as per their definition, group_sex covers 4+ participants. Shall we keep foursome and fivesome, or mass edit into group_sex to match Danbooru?
EDIT:
elemental_guy said:
From the Danbooru wiki:
glasses_removed: "If the glasses are still present in the image but not worn, use glasses_removed instead." Glasses_off has been aliased to this tag.
From the Danbooru wiki:
glasses_removed: "If the glasses are still present in the image but not worn, use glasses_removed instead." Glasses_off has been aliased to this tag.
Will edit glasses_off into glasses_removed.
Posted on: 08/28/12 12:38AM
Daijin said:
Do we have different definitions for gangbang and gangrape; as Danbooru only uses gangbang. If we do not have two distinct definitions, any objections of gangrape -> gangbang?
A lot of images have both tags on them as members are most likely using them to mean the same thing: gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;tags=gangrape+gangbang
Do we have different definitions for gangbang and gangrape; as Danbooru only uses gangbang. If we do not have two distinct definitions, any objections of gangrape -> gangbang?
A lot of images have both tags on them as members are most likely using them to mean the same thing: gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;tags=gangrape+gangbang
Make sure to go through [[gangrape -rape]] first to make sure that all of the images depicting rape are actually tagged rape. Other than that, I don't see any problem.
Posted on: 08/28/12 12:46AM
Only a 26 images come up with [[gangrape -rape]]. I actually expected more. Will add the rape tag as appropriate in this batch.
Posted on: 09/08/12 02:49AM
I know it's probably late in the game to starting whole tags from scratch, but would it be a good idea to have a male_masturbation tag for those pics that aren't really yaoi but only appeal to those who are into it? I add -penis and -yaoi along with masturbation in the search and I still get pictures which are male only.
Also would it be a good idea to rid ourselves of the vagina tag since we have pussy?
Also would it be a good idea to rid ourselves of the vagina tag since we have pussy?
Posted on: 09/08/12 04:10AM
Should have been aliased. Vagina I mean.
I'm not sure what is going on here. You are asking for a tag string or tag for a male masturbating but with females present?
I'm not sure what is going on here. You are asking for a tag string or tag for a male masturbating but with females present?
Add Reply