Now Viewing: [Tagging] Gardeners Guild: Discuss Tagging Here!
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 09/01/16 11:59PM
Xalrun said:
dimple_(mob_psycho_100) or Ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)?
dimple_(mob_psycho_100) or Ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)?
ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)
Posted on: 09/03/16 08:27AM
There are 2 tags to describe the same character (felix argyle, from the re:zero series): felix_argyle and ferris_(re:zero). I feel this is somewhat confusing, so i'd suggest merging the tags (don't know if thats possible here on gelbooru), or to pick one as the 'official' one.
Posted on: 09/03/16 10:09AM
lahdeedah said:
ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)
Xalrun said:
dimple_(mob_psycho_100) or Ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)?
dimple_(mob_psycho_100) or Ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)?
ekubo_(mob_psycho_100)
Fixed.
Posted on: 09/03/16 11:44AM
unseen_eye said:
There are 2 tags to describe the same character (felix argyle, from the re:zero series): felix_argyle and ferris_(re:zero). I feel this is somewhat confusing, so i'd suggest merging the tags (don't know if thats possible here on gelbooru), or to pick one as the 'official' one.
There are 2 tags to describe the same character (felix argyle, from the re:zero series): felix_argyle and ferris_(re:zero). I feel this is somewhat confusing, so i'd suggest merging the tags (don't know if thats possible here on gelbooru), or to pick one as the 'official' one.
ferris_(re:zero) --> felix_argyle done.
Posted on: 09/17/16 08:58AM
Io_Euclase and Io_(Granblue_Fantasy) refer to the same person.
Posted on: 09/17/16 12:49PM
Are images like this by chance being deleted?
post #3200943
I don't have the id, but some of senzaki_ema pictures like it were removed... or corrupted perhaps?
post #3200943
I don't have the id, but some of senzaki_ema pictures like it were removed... or corrupted perhaps?
Posted on: 09/17/16 01:31PM
Anti_Gendou said:
Are images like this by chance being deleted?
post #3200943
I don't have the id, but some of senzaki_ema pictures like it were removed... or corrupted perhaps?
Are images like this by chance being deleted?
post #3200943
I don't have the id, but some of senzaki_ema pictures like it were removed... or corrupted perhaps?
Yes, they are being deleted because they have terrible jpeg compression artifacts.
Isometric tag misunderstandings
Posted on: 09/19/16 08:45AM
Apologies if bad place to post.
The tag 'isometric' is being widely misused:
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...s=list&tags=isometric
Images that are stylized as if they are taking place on one single tile of a simulated world based on tiles, as in a video game, are not necessarily isometric.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3341270
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3045656
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2965446
These are not isometric perspective images.
Isometric perspective is an idealized, physically impossible perspective as if viewing from infinitely far away through an infinitely long lens. Two lines that are physically parallel in reality MUST appear parallel in the image or it's not isometric. In those links you see lines converging and further-away objects being foreshortened; this is not isometric perspective.
Strictly speaking, there should also be defined X, Y, and Z axis which are all exactly 120° apart, which is what distinguishes isometric projection from other forms of parallel projection. However this is widely ignored in video game / simulation / pixel art terminology so I would not be a stickler for it.
However, it is just wrong to have realistic two-point perspective projection drawings tagged "isometric."
The tag 'isometric' is being widely misused:
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...s=list&tags=isometric
Images that are stylized as if they are taking place on one single tile of a simulated world based on tiles, as in a video game, are not necessarily isometric.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3341270
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3045656
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2965446
These are not isometric perspective images.
Isometric perspective is an idealized, physically impossible perspective as if viewing from infinitely far away through an infinitely long lens. Two lines that are physically parallel in reality MUST appear parallel in the image or it's not isometric. In those links you see lines converging and further-away objects being foreshortened; this is not isometric perspective.
Strictly speaking, there should also be defined X, Y, and Z axis which are all exactly 120° apart, which is what distinguishes isometric projection from other forms of parallel projection. However this is widely ignored in video game / simulation / pixel art terminology so I would not be a stickler for it.
However, it is just wrong to have realistic two-point perspective projection drawings tagged "isometric."
Posted on: 09/19/16 10:22AM
AnimeBelongsInTheTrash said:
Apologies if bad place to post.
The tag 'isometric' is being widely misused:
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...s=list&tags=isometric
Images that are stylized as if they are taking place on one single tile of a simulated world based on tiles, as in a video game, are not necessarily isometric.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3341270
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3045656
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2965446
These are not isometric perspective images.
Isometric perspective is an idealized, physically impossible perspective as if viewing from infinitely far away through an infinitely long lens. Two lines that are physically parallel in reality MUST appear parallel in the image or it's not isometric. In those links you see lines converging and further-away objects being foreshortened; this is not isometric perspective.
Strictly speaking, there should also be defined X, Y, and Z axis which are all exactly 120° apart, which is what distinguishes isometric projection from other forms of parallel projection. However this is widely ignored in video game / simulation / pixel art terminology so I would not be a stickler for it.
However, it is just wrong to have realistic two-point perspective projection drawings tagged "isometric."
Apologies if bad place to post.
The tag 'isometric' is being widely misused:
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...s=list&tags=isometric
Images that are stylized as if they are taking place on one single tile of a simulated world based on tiles, as in a video game, are not necessarily isometric.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3341270
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3045656
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2965446
These are not isometric perspective images.
Isometric perspective is an idealized, physically impossible perspective as if viewing from infinitely far away through an infinitely long lens. Two lines that are physically parallel in reality MUST appear parallel in the image or it's not isometric. In those links you see lines converging and further-away objects being foreshortened; this is not isometric perspective.
Strictly speaking, there should also be defined X, Y, and Z axis which are all exactly 120° apart, which is what distinguishes isometric projection from other forms of parallel projection. However this is widely ignored in video game / simulation / pixel art terminology so I would not be a stickler for it.
However, it is just wrong to have realistic two-point perspective projection drawings tagged "isometric."
Danbooru's current isometric wiki may clarify the tag usage for you:
danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/38721
Posted on: 09/19/16 02:01PM
Cool, thanks, this wiki entry confirms that 'isometric' is being used exactly the way I said it should be used.
I cleaned up a bunch of the mistagged images but there are still more.
I cleaned up a bunch of the mistagged images but there are still more.
Add Reply