17 comments (0 hidden)
Lil-Kiyo >> #626160
Posted on 2011-02-19 14:56:31 Score: 25 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Oh wow.. This is actually pretty good.
Anonymous >> #626163
Posted on 2011-02-19 15:03:25 Score: 16 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Poor girl, I would have kissed and licked and sucked her too!
Anonymous >> #626164
Posted on 2011-02-19 15:04:22 Score: 32 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She is fucking super-hot. Why would she ever need to use that thing?
NoIcecream? >> #626293
Posted on 2011-02-19 17:08:24 Score: 16 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Though I agree she would probably never need to use that thing, I find the idea of watching her do so to be a huge turn on. Perhaps she has been bad and tonight she isn't allowed to do anything else. Could be the other way around and I'm forced to just watch. Or perhaps...............
Anonymous >> #626498
Posted on 2011-02-19 21:22:58 Score: 14 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
The more Makoto produces, the more I'm convinced that he's unparalleled in futanari art. Actually, as far as I'm concerned, the penis (lol) is a peripheral part of the drawings, since he's so good at rendering plush bodies.
Anonymous >> #626504
Posted on 2011-02-19 21:30:39 Score: 5 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
must be a satisfying workout :P
Anonymous >> #626652
Posted on 2011-02-19 23:35:42 Score: 4 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Well its not really that she would need to use it but more likely being a futa (usally with hyper incresed sex drive) shes horny 100% of the time so when theres no one around to fuck she hits the onahole...
johanp >> #627852
Posted on 2011-02-20 21:09:15 Score: 6 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
meanwhile her trusty battery powered vibrator needs to be recharged after giving a good servicing to her beautiful [bound to be] pussy. i agree about the "plush bodies." yummy!
Anonymous >> #627865
Posted on 2011-02-20 21:23:26 Score: -15 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
it's interesting. futanari is really super popular, yet essentially -stay with me for this, don't jump to conclusions yet- they're traps with boobs. people who fap to traps (ha! a rhyme! sorta...) are either super confident in their sexuality, or confused... normally. maybe they're just sick fucks, who knows. either way, they're usually derided for thusly being "gay" since they're jerking off to guys. yet essentially a futa is a trap with that little bit of femininity to them, particularly if they're depicted as newhalfs (futa with actual male anatamy, no magic pOnOs in place of clit)
so my question is, why are (nehalf futa, at least) still okay to be fapped to as "straight"? unless you ignore the pOnOs n' balls, you're essentially fapping to a pOnOs...attached to a girl. but still fapping to a pOnOs.
this may be tl;dr. so here's the short: futa = trap w/boobs, so why are they still considered "straight" fapping material?
btw, 100 internets to anyone who knoes and lists where pOnOs came from. check tvtropes if ya don't
Anonymous >> #628125
Posted on 2011-02-21 00:32:49 Score: 47 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Futanari is not a "trap w/ boobs." Your definition is backwards. Futanari is a woman with a penis. The distinction, at least put into words, is subtle, but it is extant. I know that, for myself, the futanari's penis functions as an explicit indicator of highly charged eroticism. While I have no problems popping boners over a woman's body and her genitalia, there is admittedly something more abstract about the vagina, compared to the penis, in how it acts within sexual stimulation and imagery. I also think of the futanari's penis as anatomical appropriation, which is a kind of transference of traditional sexual power. That is hot!
The people who accuse those who get satisfaction out of futanari pornography have yet to define what "gay" actually means in full capacity. For example, it is known that the citizens of ancient Greece celebrated relationships between men and adolescents; yet this was (to my knowledge) never identified as "homosexual" within the society. In my opinion, there are too many gray areas in how sexuality is -- and can be-- defined for us to neatly designate that a "gay threshold" has been crossed once any individual finds themselves aroused by a penis. Or if someone can neatly designate, I've yet to see it done in a way that doesn't create problematic binaries. I'm fairly convinced by Judith Butler's assertion that gender is performative, and that this performative aspect plays into our sexuality.
I hope this answer helps somewhat.