Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Anonymous commented at 2014-08-20 16:42:34 » #1589277

What is this "Pachirisu is op as hell" thing now? Not that I'm complaining or anything, just asking.

1 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2014-08-20 17:02:08 » #1589287

>> #1589277

You see, in the most recent real-world Pokémon National Championships in the Double-Battle Cup, a skilled player managed to beat a Mega Kangaskhan in the Finals by using Pachirisu, a low-tier 'mon, thanks to a convoluted team strategy.

Therefor, the Internet now assumes that the little Pika-Squirrel is "Overpowered" despite the glaring differences between single and double-battle mechanics and play.

12 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2014-08-20 17:53:21 » #1589300

fb hf rvb dgc f

0 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2014-08-20 17:55:45 » #1589301

why is the comment system such garbage it just randomly doesn't post comments every once in a while for no discernible reason whatsoever

2 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2014-08-20 17:59:23 » #1589303

>> #1589287

What the hell do "the glaring differences between single and double-battle mechanics and play" have to do with anything else you just said?

5 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2014-08-20 20:13:05 » #1589349

It's the fact that tonnes of people are jumping to the conclusion that any and all Pokémon are viable for competitive battle; that Delcatties can now be considered worthy to take on Alakazams- just because the current Champion fielded a Pachirisu on his team.

They are failing to acknowledge that it was a highly skilled player, and that he specifically trained his Pachirisu into a very specialised role.

In a Single Battle against anything competitive- the Pachirisu would've been stomped.

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2014-08-21 00:23:16 » #1589459

"They are failing to acknowledge that it was a highly skilled player"

Nobody's doing this.

"and that he specifically trained his Pachirisu into a very specialised role."

And everyone's well aware of this. The general attitude is much more "every Pokemon has a role/niche" than "every Pokemon can be used for every purpose"

"In a Single Battle against anything competitive- the Pachirisu would've been stomped."

You're trying to "correct" everyone by saying this stuff, but would you do the reverse? If a Singles tournament had an unexpected Pokemon in the champion's team, and people starting thinking of it as a great competitive pick, would you insistently remind everyone that it would be weak in Doubles? I somehow doubt it; you're evidently putting the Singles format on a pedestal as the "real" format. If there's a good basis for that line of thinking I've yet to hear it.

20 Points Flag