Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Tabletpull commented at 2018-02-18 15:06:44 » #2212976

Hot, but racist. I feel conflicted

2 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-02-18 15:36:40 » #2212987

it's not racist it's not the Nazi cross

4 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-02-18 15:39:27 » #2212989

its boudist symbol

3 Points Flag
LivingCorpse commented at 2018-02-18 23:47:30 » #2213108

Yep, it originally meant peace but than the Nazi's ruined it. The KKK was also a group for peace but then racists turned it into something evil and took it over.

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-02-19 17:56:30 » #2213348

@LivingCorpse

Kinda like what SJW's are doing to Liberal Values

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-02-19 19:04:31 » #2213360

Too true livingcorpse. The symbol is no more than the representation of evil, hatred, and blind devotion to the past and absolute refusal towards the future.

1 Points Flag
LivingCorpse commented at 2018-02-20 06:40:00 » #2213466

@2213348 More like every movement or good cause ever. When you make something, no matter how good your intentions are, someone will find a way to abuse it.

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-02-20 06:57:22 » #2213469

There was nothing peaceful about the KKK. It was made by confederates after the American Civil War. Their goal from the start was to resist Southern Reconstruction, which meant they opposed blacks becoming free.

As for the original post, the swastika might originate as a symbol of peace, but just look at the image. She is not some buddhist priest. This is what the symbol means now.

4 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-10-14 15:47:09 » #2291847

@2213469
"This is what the symbol means now."

No, it does not. The Manji is still used in temples in Japan and throughout Asia. Don't shove your Western world view on everyone and pretend they think the same as you.

6 Points Flag