Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite | Pool Relationships
More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)
User Comments:
Cruisinginthe1980s commented at 2018-04-19 20:49:59 » #2230843
Totally thought this was a loli version of Takane from the Idolmaster franchise.
For reference:
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4067074
2 Points
Flag
Totally thought this was a loli version of Takane from the Idolmaster franchise.
For reference:
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4067074
2 Points
Flag
Cruisinginthe1980s commented at 2018-04-20 04:10:04 » #2230947
@ #2230939
Dude calm down. People are horny af on this site, so get off that nigga's nuts pl0x. "Wanting" to do something and actually "doing" it are two very different things, you know.
Thought policing is something I cannot tolerate lol
Kthxbai~ /)^3^(\
15 Points
Flag
@ #2230939
Dude calm down. People are horny af on this site, so get off that nigga's nuts pl0x. "Wanting" to do something and actually "doing" it are two very different things, you know.
Thought policing is something I cannot tolerate lol
Kthxbai~ /)^3^(\
15 Points
Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-04-20 17:23:41 » #2231190
> Thought policing is something I cannot tolerate
And yet you are kind of doing it.
I don't know if anon 1 is actually serious or just a troll. And I fully agree that "wanting" is not the same as "doing" it.
I think you missed the point of comment #2230939. Hint - look at the second sentence.
(You know there are people, who can use comments like #2230842, only to fuel up their ideological bs)
0 Points
Flag
> Thought policing is something I cannot tolerate
And yet you are kind of doing it.
I don't know if anon 1 is actually serious or just a troll. And I fully agree that "wanting" is not the same as "doing" it.
I think you missed the point of comment #2230939. Hint - look at the second sentence.
(You know there are people, who can use comments like #2230842, only to fuel up their ideological bs)
0 Points
Flag
Cruisinginthe1980s commented at 2018-04-20 19:28:46 » #2231205
What bothers me is that Anon1 is perfectly in his rights talking about how the picture makes him want to fuck kids. Then Anon2 comes along, and tries to confront Anon1 about his desires in a morally condescending way.
I don't see Anon1 trying to BLAME the picture/ artist for his wanting to fuck kids, all I see is him essentially remarking "Wow this pic is so damn sexy, makes you wanna fuck kids."
^Ain't nothing wrong with that. Now I could be wrong and Anon1 could potentially be mentally unstable or something, but I'm not just going to jump to that assumption based on his message.
When I say thought policing, I mean it as a way to inhibit other people from thinking a certain way, or even worse trying to shame them for the way they think. It is very clear Anon2 was attempting to do this, regardless of his reasoning. I mean, maybe the dude had good intentions. I honestly don't know what what going through his head when he made that comment. But the net result comes off as a either a personal insult to another member or as a person who wants to be applauded for his white-knighting. (Harassing other members for their fetishes is against the rules on this site as far as I am aware).
Sorry for writing a freaking essay above, but I felt obligated to clear things up a bit. ^^;
(And fyi, I do not condone flaming Anon2 just because he condescended to Anon1; such actions are childish at best. I am merely expressing my disagreement with the stance Anon2 presented)
/)^3^(\
8 Points
Flag
What bothers me is that Anon1 is perfectly in his rights talking about how the picture makes him want to fuck kids. Then Anon2 comes along, and tries to confront Anon1 about his desires in a morally condescending way.
I don't see Anon1 trying to BLAME the picture/ artist for his wanting to fuck kids, all I see is him essentially remarking "Wow this pic is so damn sexy, makes you wanna fuck kids."
^Ain't nothing wrong with that. Now I could be wrong and Anon1 could potentially be mentally unstable or something, but I'm not just going to jump to that assumption based on his message.
When I say thought policing, I mean it as a way to inhibit other people from thinking a certain way, or even worse trying to shame them for the way they think. It is very clear Anon2 was attempting to do this, regardless of his reasoning. I mean, maybe the dude had good intentions. I honestly don't know what what going through his head when he made that comment. But the net result comes off as a either a personal insult to another member or as a person who wants to be applauded for his white-knighting. (Harassing other members for their fetishes is against the rules on this site as far as I am aware).
Sorry for writing a freaking essay above, but I felt obligated to clear things up a bit. ^^;
(And fyi, I do not condone flaming Anon2 just because he condescended to Anon1; such actions are childish at best. I am merely expressing my disagreement with the stance Anon2 presented)
/)^3^(\
8 Points
Flag
headless_rainbow commented at 2018-05-02 16:40:59 » #2234755
Yeah they're not going to use those, slut. Prepare to be a single underage mom.
12 Points
Flag
Yeah they're not going to use those, slut. Prepare to be a single underage mom.
12 Points
Flag
Hardtongue_Rimmer commented at 2018-10-21 19:01:48 » #2294150
What a sweety! You're fully prepared for daddy but you can lose the condoms. Bareback as usual.
6 Points
Flag
What a sweety! You're fully prepared for daddy but you can lose the condoms. Bareback as usual.
6 Points
Flag
1