Anonymous commented at 2018-10-22 18:41:22 » #2294588

Gotta wonder why they even made these figures after that anti-lolicon adaptation.

5 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-22 22:10:25 » #2294651

Kinda adaptation you watchin?

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-23 04:28:56 » #2294753

Dearest Anon 1

You
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4293381

Cannot
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2783674

Be
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2861110

Serious
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2785164

12 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-23 07:54:55 » #2294809

I'm serious though. It was an anti-lolicon adaptation that managed to get rid of everything of the lewdest parts. Everything.
Kisses are just kisses, big deal, not really regulated or considered explicit by nips, and the OVA/specials are not part of the adaptation, they are just some bones being thrown to lolicons as if it would somehow change anything regarding butchering the good parts for the actual series.
Nope. This adaptation was another win for anti-lolicons, just like this season's Maid crap, even if it wasn't as complete of a butchering, it sure set the trend that it's okay to cut out loli lewd from lolicon material, and look where it lead now.

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-23 08:20:51 » #2294818

Wow either you're a very convincing troll or you're actually dumb as bricks. Having trouble figuring out which.

10 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-23 08:23:53 » #2294820

It's the truth. Go read the manga, see the cameltoes, the vulva slips, the close ups, all the details put into the bodies, and compare it to how the anime has neither, they even cut out 90% of the pantyshots, and the nudity is just bath-scene shit, which is considered natural for japanese (even stuff like Ojamajo Doremi had bath nudity).
It's a fucking anti lolicon apologetic shit, but ironic lolicons (=not lolicons at all, just love to meme about it), or normalfags wouldn't notice that, since they are soooo surprised at seeing a loli on screen on not frilly dresses to notice how there's no sexualization, or it's very shitty and apologetic.

3 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-23 13:47:11 » #2294909

That the manga is even more severe with the lolicon is hardly reason to say that one of the most severely lolicon series in anime that's not also hentai is ANTI-lolicon (as in, the opposite of lolicon).

It's some incredible nonsense.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-23 16:54:00 » #2294966

Wait....so because the ANIME doesn't have as much lewd bits as you'd like you think all merchandising for it should cease? What the fuck kind of make believe world are you living in?

9 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-24 03:27:08 » #2295104

And here i am, begging for people to see Kaleid for what it is instead of saying its nothing but loli lewd stuff. Alas, no one will give it the time of day and remain forever ignorant and judgmental.

3 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-10-24 07:59:18 » #2295144

The anime has nothing that would be considered ecchi, if they were a few years older. People just blow those little nothings up because they are lolis, and it oh-so-shocking for their normalfag mind, and ironic lolicons like to meme about how lolicon it is.
It isn't. Anime doesn't do lolicon anymore.

3 Points Flag