Ezalias commented at 2009-05-23 19:16:42 » #54643

Is that the Quake font?

8 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-11-11 18:57:38 » #151262

Quake font is quaking ...

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-12-21 18:27:42 » #182383

who the fuck calls an 800x600 a wallpaper? fucking taggers

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-02-07 00:16:54 » #220755

@anon2

800x600 -is- a desktop resolution, so technically, it's a wallpaper.

7 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-08-24 16:44:26 » #412499

Indeed it is... but... 2000x1125 (16:9) for example is also a "desktop resolution" or 2240x1400 (16:10), but they're totally custom... and thus a pic of such a res would not be recognized as a "wallpaper". Remember, you can make any res you want...

Anyway what I'm getting is at it's stupid to call "800x600" a wallpaper because it's so damn low (no one runs it). In comparison, it makes more sense to call something a wallpaper if it high res but not a common res (like 2000x1125 or 2240x1400 for example) or EVEN if it's not strictly 4:3, 5:4, 16:9 or 16:10, but has a very close aspect ratio to one of those and is of high enough res to be used as as a wallpaper...

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-02-08 19:06:17 » #613255

There's a beautiful loli sitting right there with very little covering her body, and all you can talk about is the font and the resolution? Just enjoy the picture for crying out loud.

12 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-03-17 21:48:44 » #1026629

800x600 is actually quite a common res annon especially on smaller pcs like netbooks and even some tablets.

Its also good to make things at these res as quite a lot of people still use 1024x768 and 800x600 easily stretches to that resolution

0 Points Flag