Anonymous >> #373783
Posted on 2010-07-21 23:27:42 (Report as spam)
Technically not loli, though I can understand the confusion.
Dachimotsu >> #411206
Posted on 2010-08-23 14:47:25 (Report as spam)
If it's not loli, it shouldn't be tagged as such, so I removed it.
Although, should we put "midget" down, or is that racist against the Lalafell?
Anonymous >> #450901
Posted on 2010-09-26 15:56:11 (Report as spam)
It looks loli and that's all that counts.
Get the loli tag back.
Anonymous >> #488832
Posted on 2010-10-29 12:26:37 (Report as spam)
"it looks like loli so it gets the loli tag"
That is retarded. I guess midget porn should be banned because "zomg they are little it looks like child pornography"
Anonymous >> #730472
Posted on 2011-05-12 03:46:53 (Report as spam)
It's technically not loli, but for some reason people have labelled all taru/lalafell hentai as loli, so there's no point in trying to fix the labels.
6uldv8 >> #736871
Posted on 2011-05-16 21:36:27 (Report as spam)
It;s fucking dam good porn. That's all I fucking care.
Anonymous >> #824636
Posted on 2011-07-25 21:15:07 (Report as spam)
>>implying loli isn't an aesthetic and most lolis aren't adults.
Daijin >> #824650
Posted on 2011-07-25 21:26:01 (Report as spam)
For the rules of tagging on this site, the loli is valid. The age of the character doesn't matter on Gelbooru, only how they look. These characters look like children and are in explicit art, so the loli tag is applied. Do not remove that tag again.
For safe rated pics, the child tag is used instead.