Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite | Pool Relationships
User Comments:
ProxyPawaa commented at 2010-11-18 07:39:42 » #510872
Really? Thats what its defined as? I call BS. Thats petting, masturbation has always been self-pleasure to me. Or maybe thats why sankaku calls it onanism? Either way, I dont think this should be tagged as such.
13 Points Flag
Really? Thats what its defined as? I call BS. Thats petting, masturbation has always been self-pleasure to me. Or maybe thats why sankaku calls it onanism? Either way, I dont think this should be tagged as such.
13 Points Flag
XerBlade commented at 2011-02-13 17:26:22 » #618843
From the Oxford English Dictionary, the official source of standards for the English language (good luck finding that one online):
Masturbate (v) to stimulate one's own genitals for sexual pleasure.
The word originates from the Latin masturbor, which referred only to male self-pleasuring, the root words of which roughly translate to "to agitate manliness/maleness".
Of course, even Wikipedia disagrees with this, but everyone knows Wikipedia is an inconsistent load of crap.
13 Points Flag
From the Oxford English Dictionary, the official source of standards for the English language (good luck finding that one online):
Masturbate (v) to stimulate one's own genitals for sexual pleasure.
The word originates from the Latin masturbor, which referred only to male self-pleasuring, the root words of which roughly translate to "to agitate manliness/maleness".
Of course, even Wikipedia disagrees with this, but everyone knows Wikipedia is an inconsistent load of crap.
13 Points Flag
rollingcomputer commented at 2011-02-23 16:54:24 » #631170
First off, English has no official source of standards. The OED is highly regarded, but no more an "official" authority than any other dictionary. Secondly, everyone has their own idiolect, so the only authority of the definition of a word is to ask the person who spoke it. Thirdly, most linguists these days regard the roles of things like dictionaries to be to *describe* language rather than to *prescribe* it. That all said, my Random House dictionary gives both definitions.
Now lets stop arguing and just masturbate (yourself or another) to the picture :)
6 Points Flag
First off, English has no official source of standards. The OED is highly regarded, but no more an "official" authority than any other dictionary. Secondly, everyone has their own idiolect, so the only authority of the definition of a word is to ask the person who spoke it. Thirdly, most linguists these days regard the roles of things like dictionaries to be to *describe* language rather than to *prescribe* it. That all said, my Random House dictionary gives both definitions.
Now lets stop arguing and just masturbate (yourself or another) to the picture :)
6 Points Flag
1 2