Posted on: 08/13/26 04:02AM
I saw someone explaining that Sigmund Freud predicted futa enjoyers from childhood memories. So, basically, he explained that male childs would imagine their moms with dick (because of course we'd think having dick was a human thing more than a male-exclusive thing) and that would consequentally generate the appeal for some reason. Maybe it is the familiarity of it or something of the like.
Seems like a coherent explanation to me, but explanations being coherent can't narrow down the whole agency there is to it.
To make myself clear, I think it would make sense if scientists explained our arousal to tits by bringing up the fact we used to feel satisfaction seeing and sucking the tit when we were babies as it meant food and survivability. The issue is that we can't be making the same correlations over and over and expect them to be true all the time. Or, in other words, we can't narrow down agency.
Personally I have never enjoyed futa a lot. It's to the point where I even wonder if I have ever busted to futa artowork. I can appreciate the artstyle at best, but I still struggle trying to understand the appeal behind the quirky dynamics and anatomy that is very often presented on it. It's somewhat like loli with sub-categories on its own, but I'm completely out of context for it, lol.
Edit: Pretty sure it wasn't on tiktok where I saw this (cuz I don't use it), but I found the video:
www.tiktok.com/@jamynon/video/7652929118417227022The argument is so much worse than I remembered, lol.