Now Viewing: Report Tag Poisoners
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
...
Posted on: 07/27/11 03:14AM
Umm... I never said it was my site. Anyways, I don't care what you say or think the work means. It's a big whatever to me. This is my kind of futa. I don't care what others say or think... it doesn't matter to me anymore.
1. Breasts, penis, testicles and vagina (futa)
2. Breasts, penis, vagina and no testicles (futa)
3. Breasts, penis, testicles and no vagina (still futa in some ways.. depending on the character)
4. No breasts, loli, penis and vagina (futa... i'm talkin' about potato house on this one)
nuff said... time to drop this topic and move on. ;)
EDIT: I'm putting it short by spelling "vag" or "vagoo". I guess you never heard those words before. xD
1. Breasts, penis, testicles and vagina (futa)
2. Breasts, penis, vagina and no testicles (futa)
3. Breasts, penis, testicles and no vagina (still futa in some ways.. depending on the character)
4. No breasts, loli, penis and vagina (futa... i'm talkin' about potato house on this one)
nuff said... time to drop this topic and move on. ;)
EDIT: I'm putting it short by spelling "vag" or "vagoo". I guess you never heard those words before. xD
Posted on: 07/27/11 03:18AM
Excerpt from secret communica for some clarification.
ShadowbladeEdge said:
You've misunderstood me. What I meant by more popular is that it's drawn more often. Ergo if the vagina area can't be seen and the artist doesn't say one way or the other, unless maybe a specific artist draws mostly shemales, it should be assumed to be futanari, because that's more likely to be the case. And yes, Boss Borat is probably a futanari.
Yavie said:
ShadowbladeEde:
Since futanari is much more popular I think it should be assumed that an image is futanari without obvious evidence to the contrary, not the reverse as Daijin seems to be doing.
Gelbooru don't rule by what is popular, if it did then we wouldn't wouldn't be changing the English names into their Japanese originals. In this case shouldn't we go by what is technically correct? Futanari means that there is a dual nature... the question we now have to ask ourselves is if this dual nature implies dual genitals or if breast+penis itself is good enough. After all breasts themselves don't need to mean that a character is of dual nature as is clearly shown in the case of manboobs. ... and what about characters that are split in two genders but are done so vertically? Should they be considered futanari?Since futanari is much more popular I think it should be assumed that an image is futanari without obvious evidence to the contrary, not the reverse as Daijin seems to be doing.
You've misunderstood me. What I meant by more popular is that it's drawn more often. Ergo if the vagina area can't be seen and the artist doesn't say one way or the other, unless maybe a specific artist draws mostly shemales, it should be assumed to be futanari, because that's more likely to be the case. And yes, Boss Borat is probably a futanari.
Posted on: 07/27/11 06:02AM
ShadowbladeEdge said:
You've misunderstood me. What I meant by more popular is that it's drawn more often. Ergo if the vagina area can't be seen and the artist doesn't say one way or the other, unless maybe a specific artist draws mostly shemales, it should be assumed to be futanari, because that's more likely to be the case. And yes, Boss Borat is probably a futanari.
...Yavie said:
ShadowbladeEde:
Since futanari is much more popular I think it should be assumed that an image is futanari without obvious evidence to the contrary, not the reverse as Daijin seems to be doing.
In this case shouldn't we go by what is technically correct? Futanari means that there is a dual nature... the question we now have to ask ourselves is if this dual nature implies dual genitals or if breast+penis itself is good enough. After all breasts themselves don't need to mean that a character is of dual nature as is clearly shown in the case of manboobs. ... and what about characters that are split in two genders but are done so vertically? Should they be considered futanari?Since futanari is much more popular I think it should be assumed that an image is futanari without obvious evidence to the contrary, not the reverse as Daijin seems to be doing.
You've misunderstood me. What I meant by more popular is that it's drawn more often. Ergo if the vagina area can't be seen and the artist doesn't say one way or the other, unless maybe a specific artist draws mostly shemales, it should be assumed to be futanari, because that's more likely to be the case. And yes, Boss Borat is probably a futanari.
Seriously...? you went ahead and posted that pm anyway? Wow... okay. Well, good for you.
Posted on: 07/27/11 07:55AM
Futanari is basically a girl with a penis (but also a vagina), who's often surprised she has a penis. It's the inverse of the Freudian canard that girls eventually "discover" that they don't have penises and are envious of those who do.
Posted on: 07/27/11 09:20AM
I've been going by the shape of the bulge if the character has on panties or panties; if I see the shape of a pair of testacle along with the penis, I tag it newhalf since typically, as I've seen in this kind of art thus far, if they have a vagina, it takes the place of the testicles and vice versa.
If there are artists who draw shemales with all three: a penis, testicles and vagina, then I'll use more discretion in my tagging of these images and I apologize for any incorrect tagging.
If there are artists who draw shemales with all three: a penis, testicles and vagina, then I'll use more discretion in my tagging of these images and I apologize for any incorrect tagging.
Posted on: 07/27/11 10:28AM
Daijin said:
I've been going by the shape of the bulge if the character has on panties or panties; if I see the shape of a pair of testacle along with the penis, I tag it newhalf since typically, as I've seen in this kind of art thus far, if they have a vagina, it takes the place of the testicles and vice versa.
I've been going by the shape of the bulge if the character has on panties or panties; if I see the shape of a pair of testacle along with the penis, I tag it newhalf since typically, as I've seen in this kind of art thus far, if they have a vagina, it takes the place of the testicles and vice versa.
This seems like a ridiculous amount of presumption to me. For one I could easily imagine one mistaking a fat mons bulge for balls, or vice versa. There's also the fact that plenty futanari have nards.
Daijin said:
a penis, testicles and vagina
a penis, testicles and vagina
That's not a shemale, that's futanari.
SweetSoles said:
I'm putting it short by spelling "vag" or "vagoo". I guess you never heard those words before. xD
I'm putting it short by spelling "vag" or "vagoo". I guess you never heard those words before. xD
I think it's clear that I've heard of them, I just think their really fucking lazy.
Posted on: 07/27/11 10:39AM
I never said I was correct in my presumptions.
Posted on: 07/27/11 11:06AM
ShadowbladeEdge said:
Yes SweetSoles is completely wrong. He also needs to spell out vagina, seriously using vag makes you look like an idiot. Anyway since futanari is much more popular I think it should be assumed that an image is futanari without obvious evidence to the contrary, not the reverse as Daijin seems to be doing.
I know it's beside the point, but wouldn't it be non-functional ovaries?
Yes SweetSoles is completely wrong. He also needs to spell out vagina, seriously using vag makes you look like an idiot. Anyway since futanari is much more popular I think it should be assumed that an image is futanari without obvious evidence to the contrary, not the reverse as Daijin seems to be doing.
Anti_Gendou said:
non-working vagina
non-working vagina
I know it's beside the point, but wouldn't it be non-functional ovaries?
I've seen non functional cooters... or a vagina that you can tell tried to develop onto a man but didn't complete.
But yeah you are more correct. Some true hermys can have working ovaries without a vagina... which kind of makes said ovaries non-working in a way.
Posted on: 07/27/11 11:26AM
Anti_Gendou said:
Some true hermys can have working ovaries without a vagina... which kind of makes said ovaries non-working in a way.
Some true hermys can have working ovaries without a vagina... which kind of makes said ovaries non-working in a way.
I don't know, science and all. C-sections and artificial insemination and such. Though I'm not quite sure what parts you're including when you say vagina.
Posted on: 07/27/11 01:08PM
Me either I guess...
Some men have vulvas where there testicles would be... or sometimes are.
Some men have vulvas where there testicles would be... or sometimes are.
Add Reply