Now Viewing: Report Tag Poisoners
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 03/08/18 10:12AM
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3769332
The deletion note mentions it's a compressed dupe of 3769675, but that's a falacy and in actuality it is the original while 3769675 is the dupe with the artists name/signature/watermark cropped out. The difference in filesize is most likely due to the use of transparency png of the child post.
I don't know of this is a banned artist or what since paheal has way more of this artists content, but it just seems kinda silly to remove the original and keep the oversized crop.
The deletion note mentions it's a compressed dupe of 3769675, but that's a falacy and in actuality it is the original while 3769675 is the dupe with the artists name/signature/watermark cropped out. The difference in filesize is most likely due to the use of transparency png of the child post.
I don't know of this is a banned artist or what since paheal has way more of this artists content, but it just seems kinda silly to remove the original and keep the oversized crop.
Posted on: 03/08/18 10:23AM
megamanzeroxp said:
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3769332
The deletion note mentions it's a compressed dupe of 3769675, but that's a falacy and in actuality it is the original while 3769675 is the dupe with the artists name/signature/watermark cropped out. The difference in filesize is most likely due to the use of transparency png of the child post.
I don't know of this is a banned artist or what since paheal has way more of this artists content, but it just seems kinda silly to remove the original and keep the oversized crop.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3769332
The deletion note mentions it's a compressed dupe of 3769675, but that's a falacy and in actuality it is the original while 3769675 is the dupe with the artists name/signature/watermark cropped out. The difference in filesize is most likely due to the use of transparency png of the child post.
I don't know of this is a banned artist or what since paheal has way more of this artists content, but it just seems kinda silly to remove the original and keep the oversized crop.
Shit, you're right. I've restored the post. Just be aware in the future that Rule.34 is not a source. Oh, and that deletion appeals go in forum #484.
Posted on: 03/09/18 07:43AM
jedi1357 said:
Shit, you're right. I've restored the post. Just be aware in the future that Rule.34 is not a source. Oh, and that deletion appeals go in forum #484.
Shit, you're right. I've restored the post. Just be aware in the future that Rule.34 is not a source. Oh, and that deletion appeals go in forum #484.
Sorry, I thought I was in that thread when I posted. My mistake. Thank you for restoring the post.
Posted on: 03/14/18 02:54PM
a user called mioxnorman (ID:136182) is probably a bot that spams images, but that's not what I want to report here, I want to report him poisoning the "-rating:safe" and "rating:questionable" tag when searching for "love_live!*" and either of the aforementioned - he's adding 100% safe card art the moment they appear on other sites as Questionable rating for some god forsaken reason. I know it shouldn't bother me that much but y'know, the fucko's kinda interrupting something here with all these safe pics
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...man+rating%3aquestionable
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...man+rating%3aquestionable
Posted on: 03/14/18 06:36PM
RHthemadking said:
a user called mioxnorman (ID:136182) is probably a bot that spams images, but that's not what I want to report here, I want to report him poisoning the "-rating:safe" and "rating:questionable" tag when searching for "love_live!*" and either of the aforementioned - he's adding 100% safe card art the moment they appear on other sites as Questionable rating for some god forsaken reason. I know it shouldn't bother me that much but y'know, the fucko's kinda interrupting something here with all these safe pics
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...man+rating%3aquestionable
a user called mioxnorman (ID:136182) is probably a bot that spams images, but that's not what I want to report here, I want to report him poisoning the "-rating:safe" and "rating:questionable" tag when searching for "love_live!*" and either of the aforementioned - he's adding 100% safe card art the moment they appear on other sites as Questionable rating for some god forsaken reason. I know it shouldn't bother me that much but y'know, the fucko's kinda interrupting something here with all these safe pics
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...man+rating%3aquestionable
I've sent a notice and I'm fixing many of these posts.
Posted on: 03/15/18 12:49AM
jedi1357 said:
I've sent a notice and I'm fixing many of these posts.
I've sent a notice and I'm fixing many of these posts.
Four more safe images were added today and rated as Questionable, the bot ain't stopping anytime soon
Posted on: 03/15/18 02:04AM
I have sent them a final notice. If it happens again, they will be banned.
Posted on: 04/13/18 03:43PM
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...p;s=profile&id=336949
explicit tagged as questionable, missing metadata tags, etc. etc.
oh and, mioxnorman is at it again
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4181965
explicit tagged as questionable, missing metadata tags, etc. etc.
oh and, mioxnorman is at it again
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4181965
Posted on: 04/27/18 07:28AM
Not tag poisoning, but this user recently uploaded a bunch of questionable franxx pics, including low quality screenshots, motivator-like pics and poor edits:
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...&tags=user:kyralloses
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...&tags=user:kyralloses
Add Reply