Notice: My personal stance on AI generated artwork. Retweet and share if you agree. Let us discuss, and not immediately scream bloody murder.

Now Viewing: Subjective Tagging Discussion
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.

internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/18/11 08:36PM

Len said:
There's already stomach bulge for insertions that cause distension, so yes, completely redundant.

I don't think you responded to what you wanted to~



Tagtastical - Group: Member - Total Posts: 32
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/19/11 09:54PM

Huh. Well, it looks like cute /was/ gone, at one point. I came over to fill a dull night with cute nukage, only to find nothing but recently-posted images there. Nicely done, whoever finished it off!



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/19/11 10:10PM

>All the recently uploaded cute images are Cypherpunks images

I'm going to rip my hair out.

Also, I had completely ignored removing cute. Go whoever nuked it~



Tagtastical - Group: Member - Total Posts: 32
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/19/11 10:26PM

What is the current status of muscular_female? While looking through the thread here, that one still seemed up in the air.



th8827 - Group: Retired Staff - Total Posts: 1264
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/20/11 02:35AM

Although I have been working on it for a while, I don't know who did the last 12 or so. It is nice to see cute dead.



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/20/11 09:27AM

Tagtastical said:
What is the current status of muscular_female? While looking through the thread here, that one still seemed up in the air.

I still don't feel like I've been given a reason why it's a legit tag.



Dolljoints - Group: Member - Total Posts: 113
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/24/11 05:25AM

internetlovemachine said:
Tagtastical said:
What is the current status of muscular_female? While looking through the thread here, that one still seemed up in the air.

I still don't feel like I've been given a reason why it's a legit tag.


Because it's describing the content of the image?
To quote lozer on another issue, "Why are you making this more complicated than it is?"

There are a million other tags that never get fought over.
It makes me think that some people just have a thing against muscular females, and so they want to get rid of the tag... which is silly, because it also interferes with people being able to blacklist it efficiently.

Nobody ever brings up sweater_vest and claims it's redundant with sweater + vest, or wastes their time trying to purge it.
I expect somebody to try to do this now, so they can pretend they're being consistent, but nuking tags because you personally don't like them is actually tag poisoning.

A tag is redundant if it's exactly equivalent to another tag.
That's a bad thing because then people have to search for all of the equivalent tags in order to find all of the relevant pictures.

A more specific tag that has hundreds of applicable images is not redundant, and it's as simple as that.



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/24/11 11:52AM

Dolljoints said:
It makes me think that some people just have a thing against muscular females, and so they want to get rid of the tag... which is silly, because it also interferes with people being able to blacklist it efficiently.

If I was against it to the point of having a vendetta like you make it sound I do, I wouldn't be bothering with the tag. I'd be getting rid of the images.

I cannot imagine someone who blacklisted 'muscular_female' would not want to blacklist 'extreme_muscle", but saying that is going to turn this argument circular.


Nobody ever brings up sweater_vest and claims it's redundant with sweater + vest, or wastes their time trying to purge it.
I expect somebody to try to do this now, so they can pretend they're being consistent, but nuking tags because you personally don't like them is actually tag poisoning.


Because a sweater vest is a unique piece of clothing. The only thing it has in common with sweater + vest is they're similar to sweaters, and share the same names. I don't see that with muscular_female, and I've yet to see anyone convince me otherwise on the issue.

A more specific tag that has hundreds of applicable images is not redundant, and it's as simple as that.


So if I write up a good enough description for 'anime', would that make it a legit tag?



Anti_Gendou - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 4357
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/24/11 01:19PM

I'm not sure what is wrong with the tag myself... the images are all of... muscular women...

Not my thing at all, but they certainly are muscular females.

Are we getting rid of the tag "muscular_females" or are we just separating it into "muscular" and "female"? I am too lazy to go back and read. Like we're doing (re-doing) to "paizufella" ?

I support that except even I forget to use the female tag... should I be more?



internetlovemachine - Group: Fleet Admiral Cat - Total Posts: 3836
user_avatar
Posted on: 04/24/11 01:27PM

Anti_Gendou said:
Are we getting rid of the tag "muscular_females" or are we just separating it into "muscular" and "female"? I am too lazy to go back and read. Like we're doing (re-doing) to "paizufella" ?


Either that or "muscle -male" would be my plan.



add_replyAdd Reply


«45678 9 1011121314»