Now Viewing: Leg lock criteria
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Open
Pin
Leg lock criteria
Posted on: 06/03/17 11:07PM
This tag is getting too broad a usage. We need to decided on specifics.
A stereotypical solid and deep leg lock is both legs crossed at the ankles behind the back of the penetrator.
Yet I see the tag used when the heels are just gently digging into the back. This is not a lock. We should retag this "leg pulling".
I even see it simply because the orgs are up and making light contact. No locki g or pulling involved. This should just be "leg resting".
Presently "leg hugging" is being used to show using arks to hug one's own legs. It is a.bit ambiguous.
If using the legs to hug but not pull or lock/), we could call that "hugging_with_legs" to distinguish.
A stereotypical solid and deep leg lock is both legs crossed at the ankles behind the back of the penetrator.
Yet I see the tag used when the heels are just gently digging into the back. This is not a lock. We should retag this "leg pulling".
I even see it simply because the orgs are up and making light contact. No locki g or pulling involved. This should just be "leg resting".
Presently "leg hugging" is being used to show using arks to hug one's own legs. It is a.bit ambiguous.
If using the legs to hug but not pull or lock/), we could call that "hugging_with_legs" to distinguish.
Posted on: 06/03/17 11:55PM
tyciol said:
This tag is getting too broad a usage. We need to decided on specifics.
A stereotypical solid and deep leg lock is both legs crossed at the ankles behind the back of the penetrator.
Yet I see the tag used when the heels are just gently digging into the back. This is not a lock. We should retag this "leg pulling".
I even see it simply because the orgs are up and making light contact. No locki g or pulling involved. This should just be "leg resting".
Presently "leg hugging" is being used to show using arks to hug one's own legs. It is a.bit ambiguous.
If using the legs to hug but not pull or lock/), we could call that "hugging_with_legs" to distinguish.
This tag is getting too broad a usage. We need to decided on specifics.
A stereotypical solid and deep leg lock is both legs crossed at the ankles behind the back of the penetrator.
Yet I see the tag used when the heels are just gently digging into the back. This is not a lock. We should retag this "leg pulling".
I even see it simply because the orgs are up and making light contact. No locki g or pulling involved. This should just be "leg resting".
Presently "leg hugging" is being used to show using arks to hug one's own legs. It is a.bit ambiguous.
If using the legs to hug but not pull or lock/), we could call that "hugging_with_legs" to distinguish.
I know it says leg lock but it's really not that literal. Simply wrapping one's legs around someone else's torso counts. It doesn't even have to be sexual though this is often the case. It is possible to use this tag on a rating:safe post. We have over 200 of these.
The update you made to the wiki was a little unnecessary.
You already made a forum topic for this: forum #3760
Again, tagging issues should be discussed in forum #1760.
Posted on: 06/24/17 01:33AM
Well my instincts tell me the ankles should be locked together...but upon looking at the actual tag I can say there are many various ways legs can be tightly "locked" around a person. I would say that any sort of leg-wrapping should be tagged as "leg_lock" because the details are really too fine and too objective to really worry about.
Add Reply