Now Viewing: Still hate y'all and also this one is broken in a very weird way
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Thumbnail is fine. Source file is fine. Tags are fine too. But the scaled down picture is something completely unrelated. How did you even manage to do it?
Mderms
- Group: I do edits sometimes. - Total Posts: 1787
Its a low priority bug that Lozer doesnt know how to fix. The sample pic is post #18 and it was the first one large enough to need the ability to view the full size image. The images it appears to replace the samples of appears to be random. Its been happening for at least 10 years.
Mderms said: Its a low priority bug that Lozer doesnt know how to fix. The sample pic is post #18 and it was the first one large enough to need the ability to view the full size image. The images it appears to replace the samples of appears to be random. Its been happening for at least 10 years.
This one sounds like fun. My condolences to the coders. :D
It's not a hash collision. You can inspect the site, and the html <section> tag of the images contain the md5. The original image is: 84c14abdde5b3493dc1cf91d3124ce02 The new one: cd91c9be9d7789545e9abaa028cf4751
Also, if it would be a hash collision, it would not be limited to one specific image. To me, that aspect is what makes this super weird. Why that specific one?
Mderms
- Group: I do edits sometimes. - Total Posts: 1787
If I remember it specifically has something to do with it being the first image needing a sample (I.E. the first image with the option to view the full size image), and for whatever reason that specific sample poisons other samples sometimes. I have no idea of the criteria for what specific samples it effects but it seems to be predominantly in the 200k image id range from the few dozen or so I've seen. Lozer would know more if he wants to chime in.