Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
i don't like big asses, but if there's no muscle back there it's implied that they have incredibly weak hips, in other words some of the most important/strong muscles are underdeveloped.
i like women how i like my tools: extra durable. if i ever get with someone i don't wanna be constantly worried about accidentally hurting them. knocking someone over onto a hard surface can seriously hurt them, if their hip muscles are too small/weak just bumping into them would be enough to do that. if i'm running backwards holding a minifridge or something i seriously don't need to be worried about trampling them to death.
for purely aesthetic purposes i do prefer thin/flat asses. unless they're sitting on the self-insert then i'd want a regular/medium ass.
hunter_of_the_sauce said: i don't like big asses, but if there's no muscle back there it's implied that they have incredibly weak hips, in other words some of the most important/strong muscles are underdeveloped.
i like women how i like my tools: extra durable. if i ever get with someone i don't wanna be constantly worried about accidentally hurting them. knocking someone over onto a hard surface can seriously hurt them, if their hip muscles are too small/weak just bumping into them would be enough to do that. if i'm running backwards holding a minifridge or something i seriously don't need to be worried about trampling them to death.
for purely aesthetic purposes i do prefer thin/flat asses.
But why?
If you're yapping about "weak muscular structure" and whatnot, then surely a flat ass would feed into that weakness?
Plus a bigger/rounder ass is always more aesthetically pleasing, but that's more opinionated.
doopaboop said: We need official butt size definitions, because this is chaotic. Butts shouldn't be agents of chaos, the potential dangers involved are too extreme.
the main issue is that there isn't a good definition to go off. unlike with breast sizes there isn't a irl chart we can compare to and even if there was we can't directly measure the characters.
it's also relative/subjective; an ass protruding 3cm off a grown woman would be normal or even flat, but on a infant that's a massive ass.
SadSap said: But why?
If you're yapping about "weak muscular structure" and whatnot, then surely a flat ass would feed into that weakness?
i don't understand what you're asking here. maybe you somehow thought that i actually prefer weak women or thin asses irl?
are you confused about the gap between what i think looks better and what i'd prefer in a real person?