Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2011-12-10 12:37:00 » #947704
Russian, that's Su-9 (1946). And yes, soviet-made RD-10's were greatly inspired by Jumo-004, re-made to Soviet industry standards.
Next time you'll want to astonish interwebz with your "deep knowledge" - do some google first, dude :-)
---
WBR, Mhvost
6 Points Flag
Russian, that's Su-9 (1946). And yes, soviet-made RD-10's were greatly inspired by Jumo-004, re-made to Soviet industry standards.
Next time you'll want to astonish interwebz with your "deep knowledge" - do some google first, dude :-)
---
WBR, Mhvost
6 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2011-12-23 23:19:56 » #958725
@Anon1 - How about the epicness of your fail, not looking up the fact that, aside from the engines, this is not an Me-262, nor has anything to do with it aside from layout (which, btw, is shared by the Gloster Meteor).
Is your name Yakovlev, btw? If you knew the history of this aircraft, you might know why I have to ask.
7 Points Flag
@Anon1 - How about the epicness of your fail, not looking up the fact that, aside from the engines, this is not an Me-262, nor has anything to do with it aside from layout (which, btw, is shared by the Gloster Meteor).
Is your name Yakovlev, btw? If you knew the history of this aircraft, you might know why I have to ask.
7 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-02-05 20:12:46 » #995549
The layout does look from this angle very very much like an Me-262. Any discrepancy on the proportions could have been chalked up to a mistake on the part of the artist. However, looking closely the gun layout is all wrong. It matches that of the Su-9 prototype (not the one actually produced, which bore a slight resemblance to the MiG-21)
The glassless cockpit obvious doesn't match anything actually made, in that era or since.
1 Points Flag
The layout does look from this angle very very much like an Me-262. Any discrepancy on the proportions could have been chalked up to a mistake on the part of the artist. However, looking closely the gun layout is all wrong. It matches that of the Su-9 prototype (not the one actually produced, which bore a slight resemblance to the MiG-21)
The glassless cockpit obvious doesn't match anything actually made, in that era or since.
1 Points Flag
1