Anonymous commented at 2011-12-03 13:19:26 » #941909

whoa..is this a little penis
and looks like he has no balls o.o

31 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-03 13:20:07 » #941910

oh and it's animated! saweeet.

29 Points Flag

pureangel commented at 2011-12-03 19:20:31 » #942126

It's so cute, though. I'd suck on it all day for him.

52 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-03 19:26:39 » #942127

In the 19th century it was quite common for nannies and governesses to provide just that sort of service to their young, little boy charges.

57 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-04 04:18:06 » #942440

so basically they molested there employers kid

37 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-04 17:46:16 » #942887

Actually no, since in the 19th century the concept of "molestation" in a context as the one described above didn't exist.

35 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-05 20:31:59 » #943829

well it exists now so it was molestation whether it "didn't exist" back then or not.

8 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-12-13 08:37:56 » #950171

Anyway, according to tags, it's not a nanny the boy's dealing with, but his own older sister. :p

23 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-01-20 12:14:37 » #982008

Every era thinks its way of thinking is the only way and thus it should be the lens through which we view all eras.

I would have loved for some pretty lady to give my smelly little dick that kind of attention at that age. :P

39 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-03-17 22:24:46 » #1026660

I would love that now :(

19 Points Flag