Anonymous commented at 2012-07-07 09:41:18 » #1110662

Gelbooru needs more dominant lolis. I mean, Remilia is gorgeous no matter what, but DAMN.

22 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-07-07 16:13:35 » #1110924

"bsdm"? ... Fial?
Not sure about Questionable, though it is conveniently censored, the action is rather explict...

8 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-07-08 01:13:17 » #1111257

Were you trying to spell fail? Sir, that makes your statement a fail.

4 Points Flag

Lord_Garthaur commented at 2012-07-08 02:19:51 » #1111331

I believe it was a purposeful misspelling for comedic emphasis.

7 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-07-08 03:29:32 » #1111377

Remilia is not loli. She's over 300 years old.

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-07-08 11:04:46 » #1111587

How about we finish this discussion once and for all:

When looking for lolis, what is one looking for? Girls who look young, because one is likely planning on fapping to that.

If you add girls who are according to lore of loli age, but look nothing like it, they'd find things they weren't looking for, rendering the tag useless.
The same goes the other way round. If you omit certain loli-like beings just because they're supposed to be old even though they're clearly fappable by anyone who's looking for lolis, you're missing the point of tags to begin with.

So yeah, stop misusing loli tags.

21 Points Flag

TheAmazingAzunyan commented at 2012-07-19 04:45:27 » #1119673

I forgot that loli nowadays is defined by age.
Oh wait, it isn't

13 Points Flag