Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


zipnab commented at 2010-04-26 11:33:35 » #285649

someone with a twisted head tagged this as rape oO, it's Not rape. it's tagged already as "happy sex".

18 Points Flag
hrxhrx commented at 2015-03-31 20:08:29 » #1714016

It's ridiculous how you keep hearing everywhere about what kind of a problem liking younger girls and lolis, sexually and non-sexually is, and nobody talks about rape fetish, which could actually indicate, that a person is not sane, unlike liking something pure, and not wanting to harm it.. or her.

0 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2015-04-01 01:36:49 » #1714165

^ They're BOTH a problem.

Liking lolis sexually could be a red flag that a person is an actual pedophile/potential child rapist (especially with some of the comments), being a rape fetishist could be a red flag that the person could be or become an actual rapist.

I can also tell you right now that there is absolutely nothing pure about wanting to fuck a little girl (which is rape 100% of the time because children cannot consent) and fucking said little girl will absolutely do her both physical and emotional harm.

That said, non-sexual fondness (ex. the people who think lolis are adorable and want to protect them) seems acceptable, provided that it never crosses over into sexual/pedophile territory.

On topic, yeah, nothing seems rapey here. She looks pretty happy, doesn't seem like she's being forced or otherwise coerced.

1 Points Flag