Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2016-11-14 21:06:18 » #2049318
The real question is.....
Why would (gender-descriptive/possibly-offensive pronoun goes here) get all dressed up, just to stay home and masterbate?
Definitely not even close the oddest thing I have seen in last week, so who cares?! Let love love, I say!
3 Points Flag
The real question is.....
Why would (gender-descriptive/possibly-offensive pronoun goes here) get all dressed up, just to stay home and masterbate?
Definitely not even close the oddest thing I have seen in last week, so who cares?! Let love love, I say!
3 Points Flag
banana-pudding commented at 2016-11-16 17:29:52 » #2050106
How and where do their lower bodies connect?
3 Points Flag
How and where do their lower bodies connect?
3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2016-11-16 19:08:57 » #2050155
@Anonymous >> #2049264:
Almost certainly not. Remember that each person has two of each chromosome, but only passes one of them to their offspring.
This means that for each of these pairs of chromosomes they have that isn't an exact match, there's a 50% chance that they'll end up with a pair that's different from their parents.
You're guaranteed to have some chromosome pairs that aren't exact matches, otherwise you would almost certainly have genetic disorders. In fact, the increased risk of exact matches in your chromosome pairs is the reason why incest increases the risk of genetic issues.
It only takes 2 chromosome pairs that aren't exact matches for the chance of producing genetically identical offspring with a twin to drop to 25%, and it only gets worse from there. The human genome has 23 chromosomes. We'll set aside the pair that controls gender in this case, which leaves us with 22 pairs. If none of these pairs are exact matches, there's less than a 1 in 2.5 million chance they'll produce a genetically identical child each time they conceive. These are your upper and lower limits - at best 1/4, at worst 1/2,500,000. It's more likely to have fewer matching pairs than many matching pairs, so they're more likely to be closer to the worst case side than the best case side.
Even if they do, it's unlikely that they'll produce another pair of conjoined twins - those are a result of conditions in the womb rather than genetic coding. There's about a 3/1000 chance that they'll produce identical twins, and there's only a 1/49,000 chance at best that these identical twins will be conjoined. Combining all of these probabilities together, you get a 1/50,000,000,000 chance. They'd almost certainly have to produce more offspring than the total number of humans than have ever lived before they produced a conjoined twin exact duplicate of themselves.
22 Points Flag
@Anonymous >> #2049264:
Almost certainly not. Remember that each person has two of each chromosome, but only passes one of them to their offspring.
This means that for each of these pairs of chromosomes they have that isn't an exact match, there's a 50% chance that they'll end up with a pair that's different from their parents.
You're guaranteed to have some chromosome pairs that aren't exact matches, otherwise you would almost certainly have genetic disorders. In fact, the increased risk of exact matches in your chromosome pairs is the reason why incest increases the risk of genetic issues.
It only takes 2 chromosome pairs that aren't exact matches for the chance of producing genetically identical offspring with a twin to drop to 25%, and it only gets worse from there. The human genome has 23 chromosomes. We'll set aside the pair that controls gender in this case, which leaves us with 22 pairs. If none of these pairs are exact matches, there's less than a 1 in 2.5 million chance they'll produce a genetically identical child each time they conceive. These are your upper and lower limits - at best 1/4, at worst 1/2,500,000. It's more likely to have fewer matching pairs than many matching pairs, so they're more likely to be closer to the worst case side than the best case side.
Even if they do, it's unlikely that they'll produce another pair of conjoined twins - those are a result of conditions in the womb rather than genetic coding. There's about a 3/1000 chance that they'll produce identical twins, and there's only a 1/49,000 chance at best that these identical twins will be conjoined. Combining all of these probabilities together, you get a 1/50,000,000,000 chance. They'd almost certainly have to produce more offspring than the total number of humans than have ever lived before they produced a conjoined twin exact duplicate of themselves.
22 Points Flag
1 2