arktomys commented at 2016-12-21 16:31:29 » #2068574

Do NOT tag Gardevoir as "furry". It doesn't have any fur, so therefore it isn't considered furry.

12 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2017-01-16 12:10:34 » #2082316

Yeah, I see monster-girls and even human girls with cat ears tagged as furry fairly often. Some pokemon you can safely call furry, but Gardevoir is not one of them.

2 Points Flag

Xelrog commented at 2017-05-20 23:37:26 » #2130715

If it's not human, it's furry. It's a blanket term for anthropomorphic beings, whether they're based on animals or not, with or without fur. A sexy crocodile girl is a furry. If you want to split hairs, go to a furry booru.

I like Gardevoir, but I also like being able to separate the actual human girls in Pokemon without having to sift through the creatures when I want to.

1 Points Flag

AngryZapdos commented at 2017-07-01 06:59:45 » #2144824

If it doesn't have fur then it shouldn't be tagged with "furry", but if it's still a Pokémon then it should be tagged with "pokemon_(creature)". Pokémon such as Gardevoir, Kirlia, Tsareena etc. all fit this description.
If you want to make sure there are humans in your search, then use "-no_humans". If you don't want any Pokémon showing up at all, then use "-pokemon_(creature)".
(of course nothing will work 100% of the time because tagging isn't perfect but whatever)

1 Points Flag

Xelrog commented at 2017-12-12 21:19:06 » #2192197

It's still furry.

1 Points Flag