Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2009-01-15 01:59:07 » #27778
Scientifically this should be tagged futanari (seeing how Gelbooru science (oxymoron) prefers tagging as "futanari" over "hermaphrodite" 2.2K+ to 8) as the flower-girl has both male and female parts. But some would argue that though the stigma and pistil are like the vagina, the anthers are merely like testicles, not a penis. And some would argue futanari is the other way around. No testicles, yes penis. The only penis I see in this image... is the bee, who is nothing more than that. So this could also be tagged "Eunuch", though THAT would indicate the bee being male and at one point had testicles. Also, if the bee does ultimately deliver pollen to the ovary and the flower-girl impregnates herself, is that incest?
12 Points Flag
Scientifically this should be tagged futanari (seeing how Gelbooru science (oxymoron) prefers tagging as "futanari" over "hermaphrodite" 2.2K+ to 8) as the flower-girl has both male and female parts. But some would argue that though the stigma and pistil are like the vagina, the anthers are merely like testicles, not a penis. And some would argue futanari is the other way around. No testicles, yes penis. The only penis I see in this image... is the bee, who is nothing more than that. So this could also be tagged "Eunuch", though THAT would indicate the bee being male and at one point had testicles. Also, if the bee does ultimately deliver pollen to the ovary and the flower-girl impregnates herself, is that incest?
12 Points Flag
1 2