Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2017-05-22 10:32:36 » #2131206
Hm... It's probably easier on the guy if we ban aiming for the balls. Those are usually the rules, anyway.
Oh, but wait. Now that I think about it, that sort of rule really only benefits guys... it doesn't give any advantage to women.
Though to be fair, I suppose it's not really about advantages or disadvantages. If a guy were to get his balls smashed up he'd be real concerned about it, to say the least.
I'm sure you'd be pretty troubled too if your all-important balls were to get smashed.
So, where does that leave us? If you want to do this with a "no-ballbusting" rule, I'm game. Although, it seems to me that any guy would consider accepting a handicap from a girl to be pitiful. Come on, you'd hate that, right?
9 Points Flag
Hm... It's probably easier on the guy if we ban aiming for the balls. Those are usually the rules, anyway.
Oh, but wait. Now that I think about it, that sort of rule really only benefits guys... it doesn't give any advantage to women.
Though to be fair, I suppose it's not really about advantages or disadvantages. If a guy were to get his balls smashed up he'd be real concerned about it, to say the least.
I'm sure you'd be pretty troubled too if your all-important balls were to get smashed.
So, where does that leave us? If you want to do this with a "no-ballbusting" rule, I'm game. Although, it seems to me that any guy would consider accepting a handicap from a girl to be pitiful. Come on, you'd hate that, right?
9 Points Flag
1