![](https://img3.gelbooru.com//images/3b/7a/3b7a545357407691084e79e8e0b91163.jpg)
Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
sneaksmile commented at 2009-11-28 02:22:33 » #163276
¿she? ...is a shemale (futa) , is not a woman....
14 Points
Flag
¿she? ...is a shemale (futa) , is not a woman....
megamunchieman commented at 2011-05-07 14:10:14 » #723923
I'm not sure what princess ressurection is, so the futa tag may belong, but if you look closely at the censoring of who is on top, you will see that it censors the base of the shaft. This means that the person on top has a labia, proving that it is a woman. As for the phallus, it is probably a double-ended dildo protruding from the labia, which means that is not a futa. Thus, I have removed the futa tag.
1 Points
Flag
I'm not sure what princess ressurection is, so the futa tag may belong, but if you look closely at the censoring of who is on top, you will see that it censors the base of the shaft. This means that the person on top has a labia, proving that it is a woman. As for the phallus, it is probably a double-ended dildo protruding from the labia, which means that is not a futa. Thus, I have removed the futa tag.
Anonymous commented at 2011-07-22 01:17:49 » #820481
Still think it needs 'futa' and 'futa_on_male' tags. Whether or not that's TECHNICALLY a woman or not, she has boobs, and a penis, it's good enough to be tagged as futa. So for someone who knows how, you should return those tags to it.
1 Points
Flag
Still think it needs 'futa' and 'futa_on_male' tags. Whether or not that's TECHNICALLY a woman or not, she has boobs, and a penis, it's good enough to be tagged as futa. So for someone who knows how, you should return those tags to it.
1