Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
SgtMcPwnage commented at 2011-04-03 14:26:39 » #680039
the trap is attached to the ring so if she loses erection then ouch
0 Points Flag
the trap is attached to the ring so if she loses erection then ouch
0 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2011-04-13 01:40:07 » #693089
whoever said it couldnt go off is right. look... the string could be attached to anything and it wouldnt matter. if the string pulled the pin out which would technically arm the trap it still wouldnt be able to fire because the piece of metal in her dick is holding the spikes back. if that piece was taken out then yes it would fire except for the piece of metal and strap holding her dick and the trap together. the only way to take that stick thingy out is to untied the trap from her dick, making the trap itself useless. if you dont understand after looking carefully at the trap then you sirs are and idiot.
2 Points Flag
whoever said it couldnt go off is right. look... the string could be attached to anything and it wouldnt matter. if the string pulled the pin out which would technically arm the trap it still wouldnt be able to fire because the piece of metal in her dick is holding the spikes back. if that piece was taken out then yes it would fire except for the piece of metal and strap holding her dick and the trap together. the only way to take that stick thingy out is to untied the trap from her dick, making the trap itself useless. if you dont understand after looking carefully at the trap then you sirs are and idiot.
2 Points Flag
dark13death commented at 2012-01-02 16:55:30 » #966682
is so hot that someone could get hurt
1 Points Flag
is so hot that someone could get hurt
1 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-10-07 05:18:20 » #1176201
I can only guess that - assuming the artist wanted the trap to be believable (and let's face it, with that much detail, that's a pretty good assumption) - they ultimately faced the problem of obstructing the view: what I mean is the whole thing would work if the mouse trap was on the bottom of her dick instead of on the top, but then you wouldn't really see how the bar is slightly inside her, nor would you see a lot of the detail.
Still... it's not really the reality of the picture, but the thought that counts... right?
0 Points Flag
I can only guess that - assuming the artist wanted the trap to be believable (and let's face it, with that much detail, that's a pretty good assumption) - they ultimately faced the problem of obstructing the view: what I mean is the whole thing would work if the mouse trap was on the bottom of her dick instead of on the top, but then you wouldn't really see how the bar is slightly inside her, nor would you see a lot of the detail.
Still... it's not really the reality of the picture, but the thought that counts... right?
0 Points Flag