Anonymous commented at 2010-12-18 20:24:05 » #550112

cool

sign your pity on the runny kine

3 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-12-18 22:17:26 » #550201

lol at pootie tang reference

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-12-19 01:19:03 » #550404

i'm confused here...

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-12-19 01:32:30 » #550420

god dammit why is this so right

45 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-12-19 13:05:51 » #550966

charizard looks pretty badass, I want that one now

30 Points Flag

Bomber64 commented at 2010-12-20 12:10:30 » #551863

This is pretty cool, hey tmsp95, where did you find this?

8 Points Flag

EonSonny commented at 2010-12-20 12:13:12 » #551865

Everybody prefers charizard than garchomp, eh?

13 Points Flag

brandonlee commented at 2010-12-21 01:12:43 » #552680

These are 2 of my favorites, Tyranitar tops my list. And as much as I like Charizard, according to the websites, Garchomp has higher stats. So you gotta choose between coolness or power.

3 Points Flag

yiffybunny27 commented at 2010-12-21 03:32:23 » #552787

This picture is the epitome of the difference between classic Pokemon (Generation 1 and arguably 2) and the hideous freaks being passed as Pokemon nowadays.

The charm of the classics was all about the simplicity.

28 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-12-21 16:56:59 » #553338

Uuuuhh, simplicity! You know why the designs were so fucking simple? Cause the Game Boy couldn't handle more. Quit your whining. That Garchamp looks horrible, while the Charizard is plain badass. Yeah, adding some unecessary stuff like spikes looks better.

Stop seeing everything through your nostalgia filter. Hand a ten-year-old boy a Game Boy with Pokemon Red and afterwards a Nintendo DSi with Pokemon White. What do you think he's gonna choose?

27 Points Flag