Daijin commented at 2011-10-26 00:20:45 » #910105

Stop adding the pokephilia tag. it's not used here or else you'll be reported as a tag poisoner.

3 Points Flag

The_Local_Otaku commented at 2011-10-27 13:13:13 » #911391

just curious but would this not be considered pokephilia, or zoophilia or the like? that's quite obviously a human penis being inserted to a pokemon/anime vagina

11 Points Flag

The_Local_Otaku commented at 2011-10-27 13:14:10 » #911392

excuse me animal* on my phone, likes to auto correct -.-;a

3 Points Flag

Jerl commented at 2011-10-27 13:15:12 » #911393

That's why it's tagged "bestiality."

The "pokephilia" tag is never to be used under any circumstances. "zoophilia" is redundant with "bestiality", so use "bsetiality" instead.

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-11-22 01:30:48 » #932525

But the pokephilia tag was well-received as far as I knew. I never saw a negative comment about it at least. Why this sudden purge? If it's because of redundancy then that's just stupid, because they aren't the same thing.

10 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2013-06-15 17:38:02 » #1341476

Their very intelligent. I would love to slam a dragon.

2 Points Flag

BigHeartDe13 commented at 2024-03-21 02:06:27 » #2876369

that is Dratini. a POKEMON. not some random snake or random animal. that is a literal POKEMON. so the tag of Pokephillia is literally what this is. human and pokemon sex.

0 Points Flag