Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
ShadowbladeEdge commented at 2012-02-13 04:48:33 » #1001589
No it doesn't. Unless there's been a sharp rise in men with shapely breasts recently she can't pass for a man in her current state.
2 Points Flag
No it doesn't. Unless there's been a sharp rise in men with shapely breasts recently she can't pass for a man in her current state.
2 Points Flag
plummdrop commented at 2012-02-13 16:36:16 » #1001951
Even though you can see her breast here, it's clear that she's cross dressing. She's wearing a MALE school uniform; just because she's been caught in a compromising situation doesn't change the fact that she's still a reverse trap.
After all, traps are still marked as traps when you can clearly see their penis, if they're in a dress and look like a girl otherwise. So yes, she IS a reverse trap.
7 Points Flag
Even though you can see her breast here, it's clear that she's cross dressing. She's wearing a MALE school uniform; just because she's been caught in a compromising situation doesn't change the fact that she's still a reverse trap.
After all, traps are still marked as traps when you can clearly see their penis, if they're in a dress and look like a girl otherwise. So yes, she IS a reverse trap.
7 Points Flag
ShadowbladeEdge commented at 2012-02-14 06:19:25 » #1002419
Indeed, that's why it should be tagged crossdressing.
That's exactly what it means.
In fact they should not, and I've been working for a while to fix that.
1 Points Flag
it's clear that she's cross dressing
Indeed, that's why it should be tagged crossdressing.
just because she's been caught in a compromising situation doesn't change the fact that she's still a reverse trap.
That's exactly what it means.
After all, traps are still marked as traps when you can clearly see their penis
In fact they should not, and I've been working for a while to fix that.
1 Points Flag
1