Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite | Pool Relationships


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Anonymous commented at 2012-02-27 22:41:13 » #1011999

God damn, learn to tag! Futa ON Female, not Futa with Female

13 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-02-28 06:16:07 » #1012086

Is there really that huge a difference?

6 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-02-28 08:40:44 » #1012110

The point of tagging correctly is to make it so we can find pics similar to ones we like more quickly and easily. That being said, I think "futa with female" has replaced "futa on female" since the most recent server maintenance.

Why don't we just keep a dictionary of tags with lead entries to correct to? Then we could correct newly-placed tags and user searches that way to maintain the standard.

6 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-02-28 08:52:02 » #1012116

Why the hell did we even have a futa_with_female change, anyway? That tag's name is misleading, because there do exist pictures where there are a futa and a female standing side-by-side, with no fucking, but you wouldn't use that tag on those.

Moreover, with is transitive both ways which implies no positional relationship. For example, male_with_futa and futa_with_male don't have any real difference. But futa_on_male and male_on_futa does.

It's a stupid change.

3 Points Flag
H-Viruz commented at 2012-02-28 11:36:59 » #1012167

That is exactly the reason, I suppose. To cut down on tags. Futa WITH female / male can be used in any constellation. It's easier, and there's a bigger pool of images for both of these tags, one can enjoy, as opposed to making 4 tags out of it and making everything a bit more complicated.

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-02-28 14:01:00 » #1012216

The thing is, futas topping males is not something that I care for while I will tolerate males topping futas. The only way out of that pickle would be to have malesub and futasub tags -- but then so much for reduced tag volume.

3 Points Flag