Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)
User Comments:
(⌐■_■) commented at 2015-03-15 12:48:56 » #1705198
They removed the "futa_on_male" tag in favor of the "futa_with_male" tag. Which really doesn't make any sense. The removed tag was far more specific, where as the new one simply suggests that a male and a futa are having sex.
I really can't understand how this new tag is preferable to two or three tags that would easily specific exactly what you want.
5 Points
Flag
They removed the "futa_on_male" tag in favor of the "futa_with_male" tag. Which really doesn't make any sense. The removed tag was far more specific, where as the new one simply suggests that a male and a futa are having sex.
I really can't understand how this new tag is preferable to two or three tags that would easily specific exactly what you want.
5 Points
Flag
(⌐■_■) commented at 2015-03-17 12:02:55 » #1706244
How is it any more a clutter than the tags specifying where the cum is placed on the person's body? And who are you speaking for when you say that "we did not need the tags to be that specific"? Yourself? The staff? Or are you speaking for your entire user base?
It feels like something is missing optimization on the site's end if you have to sacrifice that amount of functionality for "manageability" when we're talking basic text-manipulation. Functionality being more important for the users, which is generally through which a website makes its money.
I imagine this discussion would be more welcome on the forums, if at all, but I'm too tired to move it there at the moment. I'm not trying to stir up trouble.
3 Points
Flag
How is it any more a clutter than the tags specifying where the cum is placed on the person's body? And who are you speaking for when you say that "we did not need the tags to be that specific"? Yourself? The staff? Or are you speaking for your entire user base?
It feels like something is missing optimization on the site's end if you have to sacrifice that amount of functionality for "manageability" when we're talking basic text-manipulation. Functionality being more important for the users, which is generally through which a website makes its money.
I imagine this discussion would be more welcome on the forums, if at all, but I'm too tired to move it there at the moment. I'm not trying to stir up trouble.
3 Points
Flag
Daijin commented at 2015-03-17 15:44:46 » #1706318
Because where cum on a person's body is more easily discernable than dominance in an image; dominance is not so obvious in every image. It is far easier to tag who the futa is with rather than who is in control. This leads to more accurare tagging.
Also, this makes the futa_with_* tags function like the hetero, yaoi and yuri tags; tags for searching for pairings only.
1 Points
Flag
Because where cum on a person's body is more easily discernable than dominance in an image; dominance is not so obvious in every image. It is far easier to tag who the futa is with rather than who is in control. This leads to more accurare tagging.
Also, this makes the futa_with_* tags function like the hetero, yaoi and yuri tags; tags for searching for pairings only.
1 Points
Flag
1