Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2013-10-30 23:59:57 » #1426869
Anon 3, duh, I already see how it moves, and my argument is that the animation is neither lifelike, nor sexy, nor interesting, nor really fuck all of anything. It looks like what happens to normally inanimate objects after a heavy night of drinking, as do all of his animations really. To be honest they are a waste of space, effort, and my time actually looking at them.
13 Points Flag
Anon 3, duh, I already see how it moves, and my argument is that the animation is neither lifelike, nor sexy, nor interesting, nor really fuck all of anything. It looks like what happens to normally inanimate objects after a heavy night of drinking, as do all of his animations really. To be honest they are a waste of space, effort, and my time actually looking at them.
13 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2013-11-19 22:19:51 » #1439685
Hello anon, I noticed you were trying to be clever there.
One, kaze isn't an artist, he takes actual artists' work and applies photoshop filters to it to create multiple frames for his "animation"
Two, putting art out there means it's going to be criticized, in fact it has to be otherwise how is an artist going to improve?
Three, who the fuck said anything about it being a waste of time? Waste of space truly and waste of effort (oh wait, what effort.)
Anyways excuse me for thinking artists should be held to standards or something.
One more note, most art is actually viewed for free in a traditional setting, it's more of a recent thing that even being allowed to see art means you should have to pay. Pay to own sure, pay just to see, that's a product of our capitalist bullshit right there.
You know what, another note, don't even put this chucklefuck kaze in with real animators. Real animation is an art that deserves our respect, computer or traditional, but this, this isn't fucking animation.
11 Points Flag
Hello anon, I noticed you were trying to be clever there.
One, kaze isn't an artist, he takes actual artists' work and applies photoshop filters to it to create multiple frames for his "animation"
Two, putting art out there means it's going to be criticized, in fact it has to be otherwise how is an artist going to improve?
Three, who the fuck said anything about it being a waste of time? Waste of space truly and waste of effort (oh wait, what effort.)
Anyways excuse me for thinking artists should be held to standards or something.
One more note, most art is actually viewed for free in a traditional setting, it's more of a recent thing that even being allowed to see art means you should have to pay. Pay to own sure, pay just to see, that's a product of our capitalist bullshit right there.
You know what, another note, don't even put this chucklefuck kaze in with real animators. Real animation is an art that deserves our respect, computer or traditional, but this, this isn't fucking animation.
11 Points Flag
1