Perpetual_Question commented at 2014-04-08 11:35:32 » #1515734

Futas are females; they are just females with penises. Futa IS NOT a separate gender. I don't know why so many people don't understand this. This pick should be tagged as both "shota" and "straight shota."

4 Points Flag

Gaudy commented at 2014-04-08 13:44:44 » #1515792

Then? how can we search futa and Straight_shota if we cant set the tag "Straight_shota"

1 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2014-04-08 14:48:06 » #1515823

It's not for you to understand our tagging policies, all you have to do is adhere to it. Arguing the point is a waste of your time as we will not change the futa policy. On this site, for tagging purposes, futanari is not considered female.

This is not up for discussion or debate.

@Gaudy: just search: shota futa_with_male

Very simple.

Also straight_shota is not just young boys with older women, that is a narrow (and outright incorrect) definition of the tag.

The age of the female is irrelevant. If a shota is having sex with a loli, then the straight_shota tag applies.

1 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2014-04-09 05:39:56 » #1516195

Having futa_on_male and male_on_futa was redundant. futa_with_male covers both in one tag.

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-04-09 10:35:58 » #1516298

^
I disagree. Both of those tags made it clear who was on the 'receiving end' while futa_with_male just mushes them together and forces the user to sift through things they may not like or makes looking for certain pictures more difficult.

It's a site you moderate for though. So if it's supposed to be difficult to find certain things, I guess I have no sayso on anything.

2 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2014-04-09 12:13:52 » #1516353

For tagging purposes, it is redundant to tag every combination of interaction. Furthermore, there are images where it is not always so clear cut who is dominant.

Also bear in mind that the futa_with_* tags are functionally for describing who is with who, not dominance or submissiveness; they function the same way the yaoi, yuri and hetero tags do.

There are already tags for the purpose of labeling dominance, another reason the futa_on_* tags are redundant

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-04-22 10:13:56 » #1523285

"Futanari is not considered female."

^"That is a narrow (and outright incorrect) definition of the tag."

See what I did there. Anyway, only narrow-minded dumbasses believe futa are male.

2 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2014-04-22 10:27:40 » #1523289

What you did there was show that you're a plagiarist who isn't all that clever and also doesn't read properly. Not once did we say that futas are male. Futas are treated as their own gender, neither male or female.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-09-01 07:19:34 » #1595641

Damn, can't ever get any sleep when the cats get into the room.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2015-09-01 18:00:10 » #1806359

I don't know if I've ever seen a group of more argumentative, anal-retentive people than hentai commenters. It's gone beyond ridiculous, to the point of ludicrous. Like people's world STOPS ON A DIME if something is labeled in a way they don't necessarily agree with, and can't continue until they've educated everyone on why they are wrong.

It's not the end of the world if you have to see a few more thumbnails before you get what you want. Most of you fuckers are on high speed anyway, so what does it cost you, an extra 30 seconds? Considering you have enough time on your hands to constantly argue what classifications futa pictures fall into on every third one of them, I would think you would have some to spare.

2 Points Flag