Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)
User Comments:
sonicthehedgehog1899 commented at 2011-05-12 10:29:18 » #730681
Robin-'chan'? Isn't that for babies, children, and teenage girls?
>_>
1 Points
Flag
Robin-'chan'? Isn't that for babies, children, and teenage girls?
>_>
1 Points
Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-10-09 04:20:07 » #1177653
@sonicthehedgehog1899 What a way to try sounding smart, but completely making a fool out of yourself instead.
Anon1 was reffering to Robin as "chwan" because a character in the story -Sanji- calls Robin (who is an adult woman) "Robin-chan", and calls Nami (a younger girl) "Nami-san". He does this out of amusement, because its obvious they should normally go the other way around.
Additionally, Sanji often switches Nami's "-san" with "swan" (because he's a ladiesman), and later started doing a similar thing and switched Robin's "-chan" with "chwan"...even though that one doesn't make sense.
With the explanations done, I recomend you don't try to criticize someone if you don't even read or watch the manga/anime they were quoting. Its embarassing.
5 Points
Flag
@sonicthehedgehog1899 What a way to try sounding smart, but completely making a fool out of yourself instead.
Anon1 was reffering to Robin as "chwan" because a character in the story -Sanji- calls Robin (who is an adult woman) "Robin-chan", and calls Nami (a younger girl) "Nami-san". He does this out of amusement, because its obvious they should normally go the other way around.
Additionally, Sanji often switches Nami's "-san" with "swan" (because he's a ladiesman), and later started doing a similar thing and switched Robin's "-chan" with "chwan"...even though that one doesn't make sense.
With the explanations done, I recomend you don't try to criticize someone if you don't even read or watch the manga/anime they were quoting. Its embarassing.
5 Points
Flag
1