itsshowtime commented at 2016-10-22 02:50:57 » #2037631

After sex is tagged, creampies are seen and tagged, and yet we're supposed to tag based on what we *see* in this case being yuri which too is tagged although anything but yuri took place before they were creamed? Come on now, GB, why you have to be like that?

7 Points Flag

AngryZapdos commented at 2016-10-22 03:07:33 » #2037637

Did you look anywhere besides their vaginas before making that assumption

10 Points Flag

itsshowtime commented at 2016-10-22 10:47:40 » #2037766

Oh, you mean their faces that don't even look at each other but instead "you" the viewer, or rather the one that had their way with them first? Held hands, a shared kiss, their eyes not even having the cliche heart shape.
Anything else I need to say to know that you're wrong?
Now if the *artist* can confirm this is yuri, that's a different story to be told.

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2016-10-22 16:22:26 » #2037892

Saliva trail between their mouths is a sure sign that they made out with each other.

Pretty sure making out with a person of the same sex qualifies.

So- at the very least- this would warrant "bisexual". The "yuri" is indicative of what we have right now: two girls together in a sexual situation without a male in sight.

6 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2016-10-23 14:25:24 » #2038398

But when there is obvious evidence of male involvement and they're looking at what is mostly a dude who just crew lied both of them possibly the most hetero action you could possibly do.

You say without a male in sight and yet he's one of the biggest parts of the picture

0 Points Flag

AngryZapdos commented at 2016-10-24 09:00:53 » #2038779

Obviously, some guy has had sex with them, therefore it's hetero. Obviously, they have been intimate with each other, therefore it's ALSO yuri.
It is hetero and yuri at the same time, therefore it's bisexual.

If I could, I'd add all three tags.

3 Points Flag