Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Anonymous commented at 2017-09-01 12:33:24 » #2162872

Rather poor. And also doesn't say much about the artists that they'll do commissions of someone else's original characters-- because I'm willing to bet money 23 didn't approve this.

5 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2017-09-02 03:24:25 » #2163076

I was wondering how long this was going to take to get on here. It's been out for a number of months now.

@2162872
Well, it's not like 23 didn't do straight stuff with DSG earlier this year and before.

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2017-09-16 12:13:54 » #2167407

So it's okay for people to do comissions of professionally designed copyrighted characters from Anime but if someone does a commission of an independent artist's characters it's suddenly sacrilege? Nice Double Standards there.

27 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2017-11-30 23:43:48 » #2188634

Honestly it's better quality than some of what 23 has produced. There was that weird period a year or two ago where they forgot how to draw faces (which hasn't really changed) and even drew a godawful picture of the DSG with a tiny head, massive body, and legs that were way too long proportionally. He's always had a problem with faces it seems because his early work also had some issues.

2 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-03-14 11:28:14 » #2220085

There's a big difference #2167407. The characters from anime are protected, the characters of an online artist are not. If the artist wanted to claim 23's characters were theirs it'd be a lot easier to get away with than if they tried to claim an anime character as theirs. It's another case of stolen OCs and the exploitation of freelance artists. You can make pictures of anime characters because they're recognizable, that's just fanart-- but making pictures of someone's OC when they didn't ask/didn't know/were never told is theft.

4 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2018-03-14 11:53:45 » #2220095

You wanna read that again anon3?

"professionally designed copyrighted characters from Anime"
That makes lots of money with their characters through various merch

Vs.

"independent artist's character"
who tries to make money with their character but someone else draws their characters for a commission and makes money off of it


HMMMMM Seems pretty obvious to me. Learn what a double standard is before you go tossing it around because it's cut and dry that big companies have nothing to worry about while small artists are cheated all the time. Ask any online artist how shit it is and they'll back me up.

6 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2019-01-27 17:02:51 » #2328431

#2162872
So, you are under the impression that fanart of anime and manga characters are done by artists that have actually asked permission?

#2220085
#2220095
That is irrelevant. If Jaden had claimed the character was his creation it would have been bad, but since he didn't this is no different than fanart of copyrighted characters.

No, as far as I can see the outrage here has more to do with these two characters being fucked by men. I.E it is just some fans of these characters that are angry that their favorite lesbian couple are taking dicks up their asses.

But you should think about it like this. It is free advertisement for the artist that created the characters. The more artist that do fanart of a character, the more exposure these characters will get. The more exposure a character gets, there is a bigger chance they will get sponsored and get their own manga.

7 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2020-03-23 23:21:24 » #2505113

You Hit The Nail On The Head Anonymous 7 People Like Anonymous 1 Though 6 Don't Think Before They Say Something Because there Fucking Retarded Asshole's ho Know Nothing About The Word Borrowed Characters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 Points Flag
InfiniteVegetables commented at 2021-09-01 18:36:12 » #2645210

I rate this image based

7 Points Flag