Anonymous commented at 2018-10-22 21:18:57 » #2294632

....I guess so.

20 Points Flag

Type_Vampire commented at 2018-10-24 10:43:41 » #2295188

This must be made canon

20 Points Flag

DreamerSama commented at 2018-10-25 12:31:56 » #2295538

I can truthfully say if i was Yang in this situation I would never say stop.

18 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2018-12-22 13:25:20 » #2316316

Weiss' Property*

Grammar Nazi Keystrokes

9 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2019-09-21 14:14:49 » #2437181

Incorrect Grammar Nazi.
The no additional S rule only applies to plural nouns, not names ending in S.

Also we never got a "Yes" so i'm assuming she didn't like it.

9 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2020-01-08 05:23:24 » #2478121

Great job incorrecting, anon. The no additional s rule DOES apply to names because names are considered proper nouns and actually makes sense there too

5 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2020-01-08 17:33:15 » #2478330

We want more '^'

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2020-04-06 20:45:35 » #2510133

The second grammar nazi was right. "Weiss" isn't plural. If it was a plural proper noun name (say a last name, referring to a family instead of a single bitch-breaker) then you'd drop the tailing S.

3 Points Flag

ccse1 commented at 2020-08-19 05:25:39 » #2558730

Both an additional S and just an apostrophe are grammatically correct after a name ending in S, singular or plural. It's a personal preference thing and one of the few times in English when there isn't an objective right or wrong way to do it. Either spelling is acceptable, so all attempts at correction here are correct, but incorrect in issuing a correction in the first place.

4 Points Flag