Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Anonymous commented at 2009-04-21 04:59:38 » #45236

jizzed uncontrollably in my pants

63 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-04-21 16:36:27 » #45401

Dear god...

...he IS the Anti-christ after all!!

9 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-04-21 18:44:42 » #45431

wtf are you talking about you dick!!

14 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-04-21 22:52:24 » #45481

hes probably not the anti-christ. the media is just playing on religious peoples fears, of a coming anti-christ...for some reason. for example, devil man; will bring peace in the end times. obama; getting rid of all the nukes is pretty high on his priority list.. that means peace. he wants all peace in the middle east (like every other zionist worshiper) peace is good and all but as a guise for greedy, "self serving", imperialistic, control freaks... HAHA its not exactly what i call a righteous cause. i would be great if we could have REAL peace, not just a ploy for.....whatever the fuck they are trying to do. and who knows maybe in 3 years obama will start a nuclear worldwide holocaust and kill every thing on the planet, and claim himself to be god. -_-....wait, do we count this year if counting ahead for three years, or do we skip it? so 2009 2010 2011.....and a half.. maybe? i dont know. im talking out my propaganda hole.

7 Points Flag
magus99919 commented at 2009-04-21 23:38:11 » #45492

>getting rid of all the nukes is pretty high on his priority list.. that means peace.

Just like getting the troops out of Iraq, I bet, which has been moved to 'being thought about' in 19 months. www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/25/obama.iraq/index.html

He won't be able to, nor does he want to, do either. I'd bet quite a bit of money that the date is pushed back at least a couple of years more yet. Even then, it's still stated that 50K troops will remain behind.

Also, there was war and 'global threats' long before nukes came into the picture, so getting rid of them won't do any good to bring peace. Perhaps it'll make some yuppies feel better.

>he wants all peace in the middle east

Good luck; all I can comment on that one.

7 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-04-22 07:05:17 » #45592

"getting rid of the nukes" will make everyone feel good for a while.. long enough to call it peace.that is EXACTLY why the media is making him out to be the image of the relgious peoples "anti-christ". cuz there wont BE peace in the middle east until jesus comes back, and fucks some peoples shit up. its like they are self inducing the apocalypse..


2 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-04-23 09:24:40 » #45934

Jesus was a man. it is better to trust in the lord, than to put faith in man. Jesus WAS a man; the son of man; son of God. it is better to trust in the LORD than to put faith in man. Jesus was a man. when Jesus comes back will he be man, or will he be a god? because man is full of sin, and foolishness. will we save ourselves, or will our stupidity kill us all. if "Jesus' return" is metaphorical, then we will save ourselves from...ourselves. but it is better to trust in the LORD THAN TO PUT FAITH IN MAN!! how can we stand strong, when we are so weak. we will ultimately fall, and repeat our past mistakes, for all eternity as long as we are here....... however we know this, we can change it. with words like this, and a hope, and a dream for a better future and a better life, a better world we will change it. but it can not be something that is done out of greed and ill will, or out of a lust for power. it must be a will to make better ourselves and others simply for the sake of making ourselves and others better. we may never have a utopia, or eternal life in some heavenly kingdom. but we could. space in the future may be controlled by super-mega-corporations but the spirit of man will live....or die, in our evolution in our minds. WHATever that may be. i hope it is a positive change. for a better way of living and thinking.

5 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-05-05 11:11:50 » #48630

Lol @ Wall of text above.
"... but it can not be something that is done out of greed and ill will, or out of a lust for power. it must be a will to make better ourselves and others simply for the sake of making ourselves and others better."

To evolve into a "perfect" and "better" being is to go against animal instinct for more power. Without what made us human, we... Would no longer be human.
Huamns strive to improve, hence why people want power, money. So if humans don't want power, why would they want to improve? Based on the definition of the current world we live in, to improve is to become better, better than others. And to do so, is to be successful in what we value, and humans value power. Sadly, money is also considered power. So money AND power.

Heh.
When idealism and realism crash together... It's idealism that falls, not realism. This won't change. Humans won't change. Enjoy life while you can, cause you're going to sit your ass in an eternity of darkness and nothingness after your impotent death.

3 Points Flag
zzrezz commented at 2009-05-17 03:22:06 » #52397

i was scrolling down... and slowly thinking..
is that.. OBAMA???

yea but.. he looks like hes tryin to reach something.. with his lips >_>

23 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2009-06-28 16:46:49 » #69345

Why can't we just enjoy some good artwork and take the debate somewhere the fuck else?! Good art right here... Epic indeed

18 Points Flag