Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2010-10-07 17:52:33 » #464133
Anon 1, no there is not, because this is a point of view picture. You're supposed to be the one she's staring at, that's your hand, and you're supposed to be looking back, into her eyes. Since you're looking at her eyes, you can't see any lower. Had the artist portrayed the viewer as looking at the boobs, more lower down would be visible.
9 Points Flag
Anon 1, no there is not, because this is a point of view picture. You're supposed to be the one she's staring at, that's your hand, and you're supposed to be looking back, into her eyes. Since you're looking at her eyes, you can't see any lower. Had the artist portrayed the viewer as looking at the boobs, more lower down would be visible.
9 Points Flag
1