PurpleHairAficionado commented at 2023-07-08 00:30:33 » #2816188

A tag that has been given for this is incest (Zelda and Rauru are related from both being in the Hyrule Royal Family, which I guess has literally never had a dynastic change.) Though this is strictly speaking true, Rauru must be at the bare minimum over 11,000 years before Zelda's time, and most likely hundreds of thousands of years, and is also a different species to Zelda now. Again, incest is correct, but it's so thoroughly distant that it seems inappropriate. It's like saying all humans have incest when we have sex because we are all (very distantly) technically related, no?

29 Points Flag