Anonymous commented at 2011-08-15 21:00:56 » #848219

Hands down, one of the best, if not THE best fighter of WW2.

5 Points Flag

-ACHTUNG- commented at 2012-07-08 08:15:47 » #1111520

Have to agree, but not THE best tho. It was rather hampered by poor build quality late in the war.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2013-01-04 00:19:31 » #1238571

@-ACHTUNG- Late war conditions are irrelavent to the supreme performance of the design, as was proven in tests after the war.
Saying a design is inferior because of hampered working conditions is like saying it was also inferior because pilots had little to no training before they were thrown into combat against suicidal odds.
They're trivial details that ignore the plane's true potential.

3 Points Flag