Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite | Pool Relationships
More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)
User Comments:
Linkman70000000 commented at 2013-04-29 18:28:44 » #1311599
Really hoping someone can find a source on this one, I just happened upon it on Rule34.
54 Points
Flag
Really hoping someone can find a source on this one, I just happened upon it on Rule34.
54 Points
Flag
Linkman70000000 commented at 2013-04-29 21:17:55 » #1311688
Found the source, it's just a single gif.
29 Points
Flag
Found the source, it's just a single gif.
29 Points
Flag
DarthVantos commented at 2013-04-30 01:31:58 » #1311815
So your telling me this kid was hit up for a commission and made this animation in one days time? This SaltyIcecream guy sounds like a genius to me hope to see more of him in the future.
23 Points
Flag
So your telling me this kid was hit up for a commission and made this animation in one days time? This SaltyIcecream guy sounds like a genius to me hope to see more of him in the future.
23 Points
Flag
Linkman70000000 commented at 2013-04-30 03:28:05 » #1311855
If he had a solid reference, it'd be easier than you'd think. Especially if one were paid enough...
9 Points
Flag
If he had a solid reference, it'd be easier than you'd think. Especially if one were paid enough...
9 Points
Flag
DarthVantos commented at 2013-05-01 21:56:28 » #1312924
So craigg are you trying to this is not the original source? Im very confused
5 Points
Flag
So craigg are you trying to this is not the original source? Im very confused
5 Points
Flag
Zivvy commented at 2013-06-12 17:22:03 » #1339295
I fail to see how this is an edit of Sensitive Pornograph. Is it the same position? Yes, pretty much exactly. But the scene in SP is so different that even if this WERE an edit, it would to be entirely re-done to make it look like it does now. In which case, it might as well be an original.
The facial expression is different, for starters. The scene in SP doesn't show the legs, hand, or face of the person on top, and it's zoomed in much closer (meaning the artist of this, if they did edit that scene, had to draw more scene to zoom it out).
So.. in order for this to, indeed, be an edit (of a practically entirely different scene), the artist would have to had drawn in a background, changed the facial expression/hair and add a hat to the guy on bottom, add the Pokeball, add the Pokemon, alter the scene by drawing more to zoom it out, tweak the angle, draw in the legs, hand, face, hair, and hat of the girl on top, AND completely redraw the scene in their style. Since it clearly looks nothing like Sensitive Pornograph.
Explain to me why an artist would go through the trouble of reconstructing a scene rather than just doing it themselves. Better yet, prove that it's an edit and I will personally apologize.
30 Points
Flag
I fail to see how this is an edit of Sensitive Pornograph. Is it the same position? Yes, pretty much exactly. But the scene in SP is so different that even if this WERE an edit, it would to be entirely re-done to make it look like it does now. In which case, it might as well be an original.
The facial expression is different, for starters. The scene in SP doesn't show the legs, hand, or face of the person on top, and it's zoomed in much closer (meaning the artist of this, if they did edit that scene, had to draw more scene to zoom it out).
So.. in order for this to, indeed, be an edit (of a practically entirely different scene), the artist would have to had drawn in a background, changed the facial expression/hair and add a hat to the guy on bottom, add the Pokeball, add the Pokemon, alter the scene by drawing more to zoom it out, tweak the angle, draw in the legs, hand, face, hair, and hat of the girl on top, AND completely redraw the scene in their style. Since it clearly looks nothing like Sensitive Pornograph.
Explain to me why an artist would go through the trouble of reconstructing a scene rather than just doing it themselves. Better yet, prove that it's an edit and I will personally apologize.
30 Points
Flag
1 2